From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B1A3B29D for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:29:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ABC1800E; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:29:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with LMTP id RvhAdJkzF9ro; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:29:21 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1732638561; bh=uac99V0EjhC7wUC4wskdnEV0sdDVC3vyT52kN/3ykkQ=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=mpxAvFaAqXuKCCA4tUiNDDpVJ8HDV/1fNJQZwwY9oZa8V6OjbhYJ+cw1X6igAqbwq Nxo4Qssoq9Lx9A5Cl6XS7r/7NMGkCqXS3a9ao7y/RYJt+bXflYOXsFUPSePu2OIHiX z/Hhw8/Vi6yDJ1lF1cCYrW8iG6Z8PeQsp/gKjPeNNU6Q+gDY/KQXJbxLzd+7lc/y98 LKPTMfNlEAPlsYnu9e7w+vUum+cJVMgNZEAmHh9k8Fet2AF0wZg7ybt3IDGm7y1Jqg W+6bvvll73YoJp4k8uUi2PaqSVJdgdPJi7FwEEVrZ5aGqtALviSLDqDTU+hXhdavgH S/Iatoe33VI1g== Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F651800D; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:29:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552D91B4; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 11:29:21 -0500 (EST) From: Michael Richardson To: Colin_Higbie , Ulrich Speidel , "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Subject: Re: [Starlink] Ka vs Ku Band, Signal Angle, and Weather Impact X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:29:23 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Colin_Higbie via Starlink wrote: > While obviously none of us want to lose connectivity or signal in the > rain, I'd rather drop to some fractional capacity (whatever fits on Ku) > during occasional bad storms, if it meant that the rest of the time, I > could have much more bandwidth with added Ka support. But I acknowledge > that I don't know how all these factors interact for final results. I feel that there is a Jurassic Park-ish disaster movie plot here. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFFBAEBCgAvFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmdF92ERHG1jckBzYW5k ZWxtYW4uY2EACgkQgItw+93Q3WUYkAf+PV8VPEIhK8fhFwSpiJhvg4/UrVsVWp9m xfyLgwBo//bWwYCqQjwWV4QgbUYkD725LN9irNwzRUlsAxz3MAt4VSBZNr8ZoUbU I0m4VADwHBnlLvYAB8MSbPgGMXQq5+NAqAaltBQmj8wDGORv9k1J+ElXrPWop/y3 0K2eRcpHmhdrHhtMiNEEJkWNm5GRRWIjACLyt7xW+c4gito+fonn630vtyFncues HAGMDFqt6FCKyF2x1kIdsTcikZD+U0KxxsLiE3o9x85AtpLXYe4X7VFn6fsT+8UI 0pA+0v2KJxDIR7KPTJH4Esnh5lGhyhk1jvXJh8CqnVc4yLrQiDE5+g== =l9ne -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--