Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu>
To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <starlink@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Cc: Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	 Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:25:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2586CF7A-B4B6-4916-8FA2-85150F49590B@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202304262231.33QMVPgZ097387@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3218 bytes --]

Thinking of evalorating steel is very cool. That certainly will “absorb” a lot of energy.
Now what would happen to the vaporized steel when it cools?
Will it percipitate out into fine nanoparticles of rust? (just making that up).
The atoms have to end up somewhere.

I am not sure what we know about boilers and superheated steam applies. The boilers keeps control (keeps balance?) of the temperature and pressure contained. Would the model of a boiler apply to the lanchpad cooling system?

Gene
-----------------------------------
Eugene Chang
eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu
+1-781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)





> On Apr 26, 2023, at 12:31 PM, Rodney W. Grimes via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 1:41?PM Rodney W. Grimes
>> <starlink@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> As always I enjoy the flood of information we get on this list!
>>>> 
>>>> still, so far, my research on a nitrogen deluge system (instead of
>>>> water) has come up empty for me, except as a fire suppressant. So it?s
>>>> either crazy or brilliant. Or both! I really liked the idea of
>>>> something cooler that was a natural byproduct of the LOX process...
>>> 
>>> I dont think cooler does much, isnt it the "energy of vaporization"
>>> that is actually doing all the "work" in this type of system?
>>> 
>>> H2O is 40.7 kJ/mol and LN2 is 5.6 kJ/mol so you would
>>> need ~7 times as much LN2 to do the same work.
>> 
>> Now that! was the kind of numbers I was looking for!
> 
> :-)
> 
>> 
>> Still, water has to come from somewhere, and be stored. I will keep
>> thinking about it. I like that they seem to think that a water cooled
>> steel plate will suffice.
> 
> Water is a pretty ubundant resource...
> 
> Now that water cooled steel plate, if you treat it like a sacrificial
> anode in a water heater, ie you expect it to be erroded over time it
> could get interesting.  Energy of vaporization of steel well... lets
> call it iron (Fe) is 340kJ/mol.  Large thick plates are rather easy
> to manufacture, and I am sure they could design the ficturing such
> that the blast held them in place against a concrete foundation.
> 
> Also there is probably lots of good research on keeping water
> in contact with steel at high temperatures and volumes, think
> Boiling Water Reactor!  Containing the flying molten slag would
> be a concern I suspect though.
> 
>> 
>>> And the reason N2 is used as a fire suppressant is again not
>>> because of temperature, but because it displaces the O2 and
>>> suffocates the fire.  N2 is also easier on our ozone layer
>>> than the prior used Halon.  Finally, this is usually
>>> compressed N2 gas, not LN2.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> AMA March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht
>> Dave T?ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 29462 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-26 23:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24 14:12 Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:16 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:27   ` Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:37     ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:49       ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-24 19:03   ` David Lang
2023-04-24 19:16 ` David Lang
2023-04-25  0:46   ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-25  2:20     ` David Lang
2023-04-25 22:31       ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-25 23:04         ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-25 23:22           ` David Lang
2023-04-25 23:55             ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-26 19:14         ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-25  1:01 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 19:29 ` Dave Taht
2023-04-26 20:05   ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-04-26 20:41   ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 21:05     ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-26 22:15       ` Mark Handley
2023-04-26 22:29         ` [Starlink] Fondag Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 22:32           ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 22:35           ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-26 23:09             ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-27  3:42             ` David Lang
2023-04-26 21:10     ` [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts Dave Taht
2023-04-26 21:26       ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-26 22:31       ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 22:38         ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 23:25         ` Eugene Chang [this message]
2023-04-27  3:44         ` David Lang
2023-04-27 14:09           ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-24 16:02 David Fernández
     [not found] <mailman.798.1682383621.1222.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2023-04-25 20:40 ` David P. Reed
2023-04-25 21:31   ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:37     ` David Lang
2023-05-11 16:24       ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:33   ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2586CF7A-B4B6-4916-8FA2-85150F49590B@alum.mit.edu \
    --to=eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox