From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7934F3CB39; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 09:13:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC167389A7; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 09:17:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PQgdESkEW-vJ; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 09:17:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B5B389A5; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 09:17:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55586B24; Sun, 1 Aug 2021 09:13:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: Neal Cardwell , Aaron Wood , "starlink\@lists.bufferbloat.net" , bloat In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Subject: Re: [Starlink] [Bloat] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2021 13:13:31 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Neal Cardwell via Bloat wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 3:27 PM Aaron Wood wrote: >> >> If we see that AQM appears to be not functioning as expected >> for upstream connections on DOCSIS3.1, what's the right avenue >> for getting that resolved? (and does that only apply to the >> Comcast-owned, vs. customer-owned, modems?) > FWIW, from the paper it sounds like not all Comcast cable modems > had/have PIE, which enabled the A/B experiment: This does bring up an interesting discovery question: the presences of AQM (whether PIE or FQ_CODEL), and what the settings might be (for some things need to be tuned), would be something that might be interested to emit via LLDP. And/or at a /.well-known URL (accessible via IPv6-LL only). =2D- Michael Richardson . o O ( IPv6 I=C3=B8T consulti= ng ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmEGnfUACgkQgItw+93Q 3WXLsQf+MQV171ois3/elHvH/LXW97VjCWRSVhD9pWJk2zXzfy3ccJ2q87O59Sr1 rVpaVNmWclLCd1UfB+eB3DIKHpYDd3By93XWSrfEDpMZQy9vEkvvMZ0WIqeKTOHz z7Yk44U+yubvusKfYnCvrpuWbCbVkcD5IbG2YzMzDTrWaVxZqqywE+FhbGQ5V2sp bdGBHrFhF0PJtKNP+Qaq8KmOPwjwPLkJCLzbt6yiMYoin8L9KhLRcaPBlulGrHHZ HGF3hwDBBJGTd0gUaKGqMNsWYTNpsulnH5KesRv7d/RqZDFZOCpmWWiJcuQbPnkC EOXjnEKfjz7XNwqeLpdrQemWa/cKJw== =M+OC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--