From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nextlayer.at (smtp2.nextlayer.at [IPv6:2a01:190:1764:150::37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C46C3B29E for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 14:51:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from [172.31.253.102] (guestkeeper.heise.de [193.99.145.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nextlayer.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54AF58038BD for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:51:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.nextlayer.at 54AF58038BD Message-ID: <2a6e2fbb-eda2-a5a3-e2c3-8b0b72bc7e27@falco.ca> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:51:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Content-Language: en-CA, de-AT To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <883d33bf-ee34-4278-d0e6-c495d94e9ba1@falco.ca> From: Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink as Cellular Backup X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:51:28 -0000 On 2022-12-01 at 12:48, contact--- via Starlink wrote: > > Hello, > > It’s common practice here in Ukraine since May 2022. A lot of fiber > optics channels and cell tower were damaged during the invasion. > Local operators used Starlink as the only available channel. Thank you. Are there any permanent deployments outside warzones? BR Daniel AJ