From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF3F3B2A4 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 13:44:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35711AB811; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:44:14 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: Alexandre Petrescu cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <6244255c-f9c5-490c-b740-38353af2e60a@gmail.com> Message-ID: <2n2o8o36-so57-s7r0-710o-7n1orr6n34p0@ynat.uz> References: <6244255c-f9c5-490c-b740-38353af2e60a@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="228850167-2142068611-1694799854=:15407" Subject: Re: [Starlink] Measuring a Low-Earth-Orbit Satellite Network X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:44:15 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --228850167-2142068611-1694799854=:15407 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 15 Sep 2023, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote: > For my part, I can tell that I follow one particular sat chosen > arbitrarily (STARLINK-6064) on a public database since some weeks now > and it keeps at around 360km altitude.   That is much lower than > 500-or-so usual.  Maybe it is that lower altitude that permits a higher > performance (lower latencies). Interesting, their phase 2 satellites will be in 335-245Km orbits, but the databases I've looked at don't show any of them being launched yet > (there are other sats even lower, but not sure whether they're there in > error or on their way up). I've seen some lists showing sats at 70km, which is well below the definition of 'in space', so some of those numbers are just plain wrong. David Lang > Alex > >> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >>> From: J Pan >>> Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM >>> Subject: starlink >>> To: dave.taht@gmail.com >>> >>> >>> Hi Dave: thanks for your libreqos work. did you see >>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 ? cheers. -j >>> -- >>> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, > Web.UVic.CA/~pan >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg >>> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > --228850167-2142068611-1694799854=:15407--