From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (rrcs-45-59-245-186.west.biz.rr.com [45.59.245.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98D423CB38 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:44:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A6C1897E7; Wed, 26 Apr 2023 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: "Rodney W. Grimes" cc: Dave Taht , Dave Taht via Starlink In-Reply-To: <202304262231.33QMVPgZ097387@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Message-ID: <2o06n7s5-9547-13pn-1659-s509p837o1on@ynat.uz> References: <202304262231.33QMVPgZ097387@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 03:44:08 -0000 On Wed, 26 Apr 2023, Rodney W. Grimes via Starlink wrote: > Now that water cooled steel plate, if you treat it like a sacrificial > anode in a water heater, ie you expect it to be erroded over time it > could get interesting. They are designing towards hourly launches, so I don't expect it to be planned as a wear item. The way it was introduced (prior to the launch) was that even steel plate would wear if it wasn't water cooled. David Lang