From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Main hurdles against the Integration of Satellites and Terrestial Networks
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 12:58:57 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2sp89904-o460-976s-4rsq-55nn6ps84464@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40da3b55-38ad-4e02-8c58-afea2bd02279@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2694 bytes --]
it's very clear that there is a computer in the dishy that you are talking to.
You get the network connection while the dishy is not connected to the
satellites (there's even a status page and controls, stowing and unstowing for
example)
I think we've seen that the dishy is running linux (I know the routers run an
old openwrt), but I don't remember the details of the dishy software.
David Lang
On Sun, 17 Sep 2023, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 19:21:50 +0200
> From: Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Reply-To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
> To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Main hurdles against the Integration of Satellites and
> Terrestial Networks
>
>
> Le 16/09/2023 à 01:32, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink a écrit :
>> On 16/09/2023 5:52 am, David Lang wrote:
>>>
>>> In addition to that Ulrich says, the dishy is a full computer, it's
>>> output is ethernet/IP and with some adapters or cable changes, you
>>> can plug it directly into a router.
>>
>> We've done that with the Yaosheng PoE Dishy adapter - actually plugged
>> a DHCP client straight in - and it "works" but with a noticeably
>> higher rate of disconnects.
>
> It is good to know one can plug a DHCP client into the Ethernet of the
> DISHY and receive DHCP replies.
>
> But that would be only a lead into what kind of DHCPv4 is supported, or not.
>
> I would ask to know whether the DHCP server runs on the DISHY, or
> whether it is on the ground network of starlink, i.e. the reply to DHCP
> request comes after 50ms, or after 500microseconds (timestamp difference
> can be seen in the wireshark run on that Ethernet).
>
> This (DHCP server daemon on dishy or on ground segment) has an impact of
> how IPv6 can be, or is, made to work.
>
> This kind of behaviour of DHCP - basically asking who allocates an
> address - has seen a continous evolution in 3GPP cellular networks since
> they appeared. Nowadays the DHCP behaviour is very complex in a 3GPP
> network; even in a typical smartphone there are intricacies about where
> and how the DHCP client and server works. With it comes the problem of
> /64 in cellular networks (which some dont call a problem, but I do).
>
> So, it would be interesting to see whether starlink has the same /64
> problem as 3GPP has, or is free of it (simply put: can I connect several
> Ethernet subnets in my home to starlink, in native IPv6 that is, or not?).
>
> Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-17 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-30 12:10 Hesham ElBakoury
2023-08-30 13:57 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-08-30 16:51 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-08-30 19:35 ` David Lang
2023-09-01 16:27 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-09-15 11:29 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-15 15:18 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-15 17:52 ` David Lang
2023-09-15 23:32 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-17 17:21 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-17 19:58 ` David Lang [this message]
2023-09-18 23:32 ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-09-19 0:31 ` David Lang
2023-09-19 0:36 ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-09-19 1:01 ` David Lang
2023-09-19 1:08 ` [Starlink] [Sat-int] " Jorge Amodio
2023-09-19 1:25 ` David Lang
2023-09-21 7:58 ` emile.stephan
2023-09-21 12:37 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-19 13:44 ` [Starlink] " Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-19 14:36 ` David Lang
2023-09-19 13:35 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-19 14:44 ` David Lang
2023-09-17 17:12 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-17 17:09 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-17 18:06 ` Steve Stroh
2023-08-31 8:44 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-08-31 11:39 ` David Lang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-16 13:26 David Fernández
2023-10-18 15:04 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-19 14:55 David Fernández
2023-09-19 15:15 ` David Lang
2023-09-20 8:09 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-20 8:32 ` David Lang
2023-09-03 1:03 David Fernández
2023-09-03 3:44 ` Mike Puchol
2023-09-15 11:35 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-08-31 16:12 David Fernández
2023-08-31 15:51 David Fernández
2023-08-30 12:02 Hesham ElBakoury
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2sp89904-o460-976s-4rsq-55nn6ps84464@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox