Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Starlink] data sovereignty
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 11:00:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31604.1636124427@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALjsLJu8YiC0sKRX6VjOyoiHd4URDRLd_P6OW4nvtX5vBjuGmA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 671 bytes --]


A number of Canadian IXs have pondered whether we could get Starlink to peer
via air.    I don't think this will be possible until they move to IPv6
so that they can do some geographic allocation of end-station addresses.

A question that was asked was: what is the altitude at which the data has
left the country...   Heinlein's _Man Who Sold the Moon_ is not true.
Countries have a limited altitude in which to claim soveignty.  But, what is
it?  (Would Alphabet Loon be within it? I suspect so)

Will this argument about data sovereignty be used by national governments (or
rather, the associated incumbent telco-ISPs) to forbid spending public money
on Starlink?




[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-11-05 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-04 15:26 [Starlink] Starlink tidbits from NANOG Darrell Budic
2021-11-04 16:21 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 16:46 ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 17:11   ` Dave Taht
2021-11-05  1:30     ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05  1:41   ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05  1:46   ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-04 18:16 ` Michael Richardson
2021-11-04 18:25   ` Inemesit Affia
2021-11-04 18:29   ` Dave Taht
2021-11-04 19:10     ` Michael Richardson
2021-11-05  0:34 ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05  1:05   ` Nathan Owens
2021-11-05  1:18     ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 22:24       ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05 15:00     ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2021-11-05 15:07       ` [Starlink] data sovereignty Spencer Sevilla
2021-11-05 17:36       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-11-05 18:01       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-11-05 22:12     ` [Starlink] Starlink tidbits from NANOG Ulrich Speidel
2021-11-05  1:27   ` Darrell Budic
2021-11-05 15:03     ` Michael Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31604.1636124427@localhost \
    --to=mcr@sandelman.ca \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox