From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28DF83CB38 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:00:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FD1180A3 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:02:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id eOzsPDtsrlbK for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:02:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607D21809E for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:02:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35B75CC for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2021 11:00:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Michael Richardson To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: References: <7907F9D1-9511-4254-BD8F-701888EB6778@onholyground.com> <4ea38008-0e62-1cad-165a-a8aad232ebd6@cs.auckland.ac.nz> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1 X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m Subject: [Starlink] data sovereignty X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:00:30 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain A number of Canadian IXs have pondered whether we could get Starlink to peer via air. I don't think this will be possible until they move to IPv6 so that they can do some geographic allocation of end-station addresses. A question that was asked was: what is the altitude at which the data has left the country... Heinlein's _Man Who Sold the Moon_ is not true. Countries have a limited altitude in which to claim soveignty. But, what is it? (Would Alphabet Loon be within it? I suspect so) Will this argument about data sovereignty be used by national governments (or rather, the associated incumbent telco-ISPs) to forbid spending public money on Starlink? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEbsyLEzg/qUTA43uogItw+93Q3WUFAmGFRwsACgkQgItw+93Q 3WV2Jwf+N5u2lZFfresUvxSsvLgiNzaITm9GHn+KOIQt0j0VVYFcLUxtPf4nuhAT tujmXs5zRwM/lrl3RljYyUoKQKZYM9Vp2tenKsaZ527JXJsUI8K86PizRSa8CA4A a92hqmDQQPSZlbo70h9bNiGpS8KcBVMGgqS0+Z9d+IosTRDD7mUBVeg1HppR7Zuv 6JKr0vOnVN0F2O9aefm9yDy54vdNcrhZJ8pIQEmbQXGzCFUJRlL/1V4RejPyk51q E3Zm8JzrlI6MLcGXercprLZChdIrya0/wQvTmE5eW/YKuZV6m07tH0RL2C8RXkgF kmqRoqF7NbxEEifubIlgy3O0BeAo6g== =u129 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--