From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D744A3B29D for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 20:40:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id cv6so3630275pjb.5 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:40:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Ptafwq9HK6NCyaKjMh8Ne7ul/oEJJFeZ4av92PuSqPM=; b=fXDYHbM9mHQSeGOCjQMu8+7VwIY4azQq4LtULaQRwvgtH9Nw5SBLkRiV/bPTMwcyo9 ART90v6WL9TNj7aDhtf+2EqoNENoquSFq8bhmOceOPz69hZL+J+Bg4y9RKaIZ5KKSrvD VklJCGkktRDZMiRj+3oiXyFS+NyK7WIG7npvU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=Ptafwq9HK6NCyaKjMh8Ne7ul/oEJJFeZ4av92PuSqPM=; b=2UidpL9U/oeuLrzdQ41xfol0krpOy2cq/iSopvIbpJU0OicV7STU7/haqCFOg0PDPa 7h/nCx8Y8EGXzqGrkRGsUas172UGPpqoizRKFueTs9NHcA8IrpdIVmoUL2qlv1KbYMaf GgI3z8VCQBBYyVt2Zuv7iU7A9moFZ9o4/rPC0zFPACTa/F94IvbkL55dFerxY1Mqi2/6 Ka70mqRcJD/+zfkTfmbPA8J9SPO1xNqJgPYLuhXCs0XwLsXKtW/Kn2bi4D1QU9mN0dww u2cr7J0LVaIMfgmmMUal4hEj/2RelU2zauTN9gsi8dVFU0+jVe+nU6OtWYtd8elH2qo4 Pkow== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf17CXspc8KnpcHqIGbN3ToVR+Tm9Pd639Z1h5qZY/tV01cq3Crd 1FTEYqiPjvLqfMCLOQpf7JdkkXEZmU/r4z6I X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4uQpUjEI1iZ7nuwJAxY//DyMvTWnj1mx+JrLtEEBy8SyrW+3EIVMdJozzsMVrP4O5Sm4bDkA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a89:b0:202:d56e:e202 with SMTP id lp9-20020a17090b4a8900b00202d56ee202mr733271pjb.22.1664412038700; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-72-253-196-65.hawaiiantel.net. [72.253.196.65]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x4-20020a63b344000000b004351358f056sm4152657pgt.85.2022.09.28.17.40.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Sep 2022 17:40:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Eugene Y Chang Message-Id: <34E90BC8-4843-4C03-8A74-B50AB2F22995@ieee.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_732ADAA5-250F-471D-9A33-DAC3491604BB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\)) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:40:35 -1000 In-Reply-To: <39q83o29-4r63-2qn6-1s46-n97rq66qrpn6@ynat.uz> Cc: Eugene Chang , Dotzero , Dave Taht via Starlink To: David Lang References: <198D364D-DA0E-445A-8E13-FDA24486E30C@ieee.org> <39q83o29-4r63-2qn6-1s46-n97rq66qrpn6@ynat.uz> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1) Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 00:40:40 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_732ADAA5-250F-471D-9A33-DAC3491604BB Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9B39D38A-CA74-4CA7-866B-02B35428C322" --Apple-Mail=_9B39D38A-CA74-4CA7-866B-02B35428C322 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Yes and no. Yes they can beef up the constellation, one section at a time. (For a = given launch, the are enhancing a particular orbit.) Depending on your definition of =E2=80=9Cone area=E2=80=9D when you say = =E2=80=9Cnot in any one area=E2=80=9D. Technically they would beef up an area in the shape of strips, where the = strip is the ground under the orbit of the additional (new) satellites. Sorry, when I say =E2=80=9Cadd service to an area=E2=80=9D, it implies = adding coverage to strips of land, the land under the new satellite = orbit. https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=3Dstarlink = Gene ---------------------------------------------- Eugene Chang IEEE Senior Life Member eugene.chang@ieee.org 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu) > On Sep 28, 2022, at 1:35 PM, David Lang wrote: >=20 > The Starlink satellites are in low orbit (<90 min), so you beef up the = contellation overall, not in any one area. >=20 > David Lang >=20 > On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink wrote: >=20 >> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:07:43 -1000 >> From: Eugene Y Chang via Starlink >> Reply-To: Eugene Y Chang >> To: Dotzero >> Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink >> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering >> What is the definition and differences between regular and best = effort service? >>=20 >> Creating two bookings queue, wait list and best effort subscribers, = the best effort subscribers are more =E2=80=9Creal=E2=80=9D. With that, = treating best effort subscribers as a (more) "real customer" backlog, it = would be a good way to prioritize where to expand the constellation = (i.e. where to add capacity). >>=20 >> Gene >> ---------------------------------------------- >> Eugene Chang >> IEEE Senior Life Member >> eugene.chang@ieee.org >> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu) >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 9:53 AM, Dotzero via Starlink = wrote: >>>=20 >>> I've been on the wait list for almost 10 months and just received an = email that I can sign up for a "best efforts" offering. Seeing as they = also indicated the estimated time for regular service is mid-2023, I = decided to go with it (You don't lose your place on the wait list). You = can also "pause" the best effort service so I don't really have anything = to lose. >>>=20 >>> Has anyone had experience with this offering? Any input appreciated. = If it makes a difference, location is Central East Ohio. >>>=20 >>> According to = https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=3DUS= = , latency will be comparable to regular service, down will be 5-100mbs = and up will be 1-10mps unless service is deprioritized due to = congestion. >>>=20 >>> Thanks in advance. >>>=20 >>> Mike >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlink mailing list >>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >>=20 > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --Apple-Mail=_9B39D38A-CA74-4CA7-866B-02B35428C322 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Yes = and no.

Yes they can = beef up the constellation, one section at a time. (For a given launch, = the are enhancing a particular orbit.)

Depending on your definition of =E2=80=9C= one area=E2=80=9D when you say =E2=80=9Cnot in any one = area=E2=80=9D.
Technically they would beef up an = area in the shape of strips, where the strip is the ground under the = orbit of the additional (new) satellites.

Sorry, when I say =E2=80=9Cadd service = to an area=E2=80=9D, it implies adding coverage to strips of land, the = land under the new satellite orbit.

<= div class=3D"">

Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang
IEEE Senior Life = Member
eugene.chang@ieee.org
781-799-0233 (in = Honolulu)



On Sep 28, 2022, at 1:35 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> = wrote:

The Starlink satellites are in low orbit (<90 min), so you = beef up the contellation overall, not in any one area.

David Lang

On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, = Eugene Y Chang via Starlink wrote:

Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 = 13:07:43 -1000
From: Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply-To: = Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
To: Dotzero = <dotzero@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Taht via = Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: = Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
What is the = definition and differences between regular and best effort service?

Creating two bookings queue, wait list and = best effort subscribers, the best effort subscribers are more = =E2=80=9Creal=E2=80=9D. With that, treating best effort subscribers as a = (more) "real customer" backlog, it would be a good way to prioritize = where to expand the constellation (i.e. where to add capacity).

Gene
----------------------------------------------
Eugene Chang
IEEE Senior Life Member
eugene.chang@ieee.org
781-799-0233 (in = Honolulu)



On Sep 28, 2022, at 9:53 = AM, Dotzero via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> = wrote:

I've been on the wait list for = almost 10 months and just received an email that I can sign up for a = "best efforts" offering. Seeing as they also indicated the estimated = time for regular service is mid-2023, I decided to go with it (You don't = lose your place on the wait list). You can also "pause" the best effort = service so I don't really have anything to lose.

Has anyone had experience with this offering? Any input = appreciated. If it makes a difference, location is Central East Ohio.

According to = https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=3DUS= = <https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=3D= US>, latency will be comparable to regular service, down will be = 5-100mbs and up will be 1-10mps unless service is deprioritized due to = congestion.

Thanks in advance.

Mike

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

_______________________________________________Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

= --Apple-Mail=_9B39D38A-CA74-4CA7-866B-02B35428C322-- --Apple-Mail=_732ADAA5-250F-471D-9A33-DAC3491604BB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIyBAEBCAAdFiEERPTGiBqcibajhTSsv0/8FiYdKmAFAmM06YMACgkQv0/8FiYd KmChdA/42IajL2i3Tl9Bx6ey7SgCYg078qo23YHhrd2OaBtfknWrz1Q9CdIEZ7uv ZfMSt6hX+Reg4o2e0CTX7N2ljRsIwMxZSBqtliL3Z86tH0OjUgK6eyglmU7N0C1L 3CyNxOBfNj6gSb73kh+XDROw31Al/1F5irF4e1gfXT4htNAhJKGqI8Xt07/9jLXl 1Xuy/DndE71MF/tNK2QRGrnz5HvoFfa+M00GOaXpdnI5YrcGaydjGrxeZdqbg5GD Sb8tvuZciWNf0owaQdJKwg7idvgcwQnUmVyKgSlfpD4Ny3VN3z8nqUjV5/Un0TaT a8TZZ4wF18Kjh5L9ompTb/AvWvQ1XGfOG9psOxdUzL8NkJMBk7rMkSkt2wGCLzfi UubItkBRAJo30fVxZhaCLwFn7knvgAIRMIVOfb2oWCcXSRD68gR4VLil49jWhBg3 k98gHBNfIpxkIVwzG2f9G/brPVW/jGhNcShzrnw2wYLtYWQkEZjeGaye+w4Ruilt z5zEl0WDnIEOaZEFkOHSLwYBXaqUN6VzfBcXGBZzqZeL8krlpwwF74ydMhyxXu9p XmtuFWXCRU4oZ9ziyw6Y//+r6InZ0DE0cnj25bYfRuA7BcGaF3tsgDUYPPgBHh9L eBAnxjgp149P9w/bjL+H6RY84nk/8yf+yBE4UALaCjDHcF0FOQ== =9TFX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_732ADAA5-250F-471D-9A33-DAC3491604BB--