Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel AJ Sokolov <daniel@falco.ca>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] SpaceX ordered to explain pricing strategy
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:41:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39dfde85-f122-d824-1efa-4d979e6d3959@falco.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACw=56LeJLKgLg+s0dT4Km1+pt1qT2U0KNrymOPrZZUHq8gOzA@mail.gmail.com>

On 2022-04-12 at 13:39, Jeremy Austin wrote:
> Completely agree about 25 Mbps being comfortable when latency is good. We
> (at Preseem) have a lot of data on how much bandwidth is used per nominal
> speed plan, and while the initial increase is steep (a 10 Mbit user is
> often constrained these days), above 25-50 Mbps, the slope is about 2:1 --
> that is, a 200 Mbit user causes only about 2x the load of a 50 Mbit user.

I find that data very interesting.

Is there any publicly available data I could refer to in a regulatory 
filing?

Thank you
Daniel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-12 22:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-08  8:59 Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-04-08 18:15 ` David Lang
2022-04-08 21:04   ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-04-08 21:45     ` David Lang
2022-04-10 13:55       ` Dave Collier-Brown
2022-04-12  1:56         ` David Lang
2022-04-12 20:39           ` Jeremy Austin
2022-04-12 21:25             ` Mike Puchol
2022-04-12 22:30               ` Jeremy Austin
2022-04-12 22:39                 ` Mike Puchol
2022-04-12 22:41             ` Daniel AJ Sokolov [this message]
2022-04-12 22:43       ` Daniel AJ Sokolov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39dfde85-f122-d824-1efa-4d979e6d3959@falco.ca \
    --to=daniel@falco.ca \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox