From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nextlayer.at (smtp2.nextlayer.at [IPv6:2a01:190:1764:150::37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3448D3B29E for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2022 18:41:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.50] (d50-117-141-56.yt.northwestel.net [50.117.141.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nextlayer.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5D69802182 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2022 00:41:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.nextlayer.at E5D69802182 Message-ID: <39dfde85-f122-d824-1efa-4d979e6d3959@falco.ca> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:41:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Content-Language: en-GB To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <168F6AAF-7953-4498-913A-A322D184FF2B@falco.ca> From: Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] SpaceX ordered to explain pricing strategy X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 22:41:33 -0000 On 2022-04-12 at 13:39, Jeremy Austin wrote: > Completely agree about 25 Mbps being comfortable when latency is good. We > (at Preseem) have a lot of data on how much bandwidth is used per nominal > speed plan, and while the initial increase is steep (a 10 Mbit user is > often constrained these days), above 25-50 Mbps, the slope is about 2:1 -- > that is, a 200 Mbit user causes only about 2x the load of a 50 Mbit user. I find that data very interesting. Is there any publicly available data I could refer to in a regulatory filing? Thank you Daniel