From: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Cc: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>,
Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] SpaceX/Starlink says it's ready for a fall satellite-to-cell service with T-Mobile
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:13:33 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F548B50-D476-4E54-B18E-3418978105CE@ieee.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <030p06nr-4169-9341-nn73-4n06nprp9863@ynat.uz>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7316 bytes --]
> On Jun 3, 2024, at 12:41 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>
> Eugene Y Chang wrote:
>
>> I expect low data rate because the distance will fall back to a lower coding rate.
>
> I think it's going to be more a matter of very large cells, so many people sharing the available bandwidth
>
>> I observe a difference in my phone’s batter life between urban and rural usage. I expect the battery life to be significantly reduced with Starlink.
>> And yes… if the phone isn’t communicating then the battery life isn’t drawn down much…
>
> In my experience, a phone that's trying to find a tower uses more power than one that has a tower, but is otherwise idle
When the phone is searching for a tower, it is transmitting at maximum power.
Then, the phone adjusts the transmit power according to the distance to the tower,
In an urban environment, the distance to the tower is usually less (i.e. smaller cells due to subscriber density).
In a rural environment, there is more distance to the tower, and the phone is transmitting at higher power (i.e., towers are farther apart for larger cells due to fewer subscribers per tower, up to the max tower separation.)
When you are mobile, the power is proportionate to the mean distance to the tower during your operations.
>
>> But users with high screen times will have to change their habits.
>> — avoid receiving text messages (not under the user’s control)
>> — don’t receive email pushes
>> — stop all the social media updates, messages, and likes.
>> — turn off the apps
>> — only use the phone for emergencies.
>>
>> Who are the intended users?
>
> emergancy communication in areas that currently have zero service, primarily text messages, then voice, then low bandwidth data.
>
> David Lang
>
>> Gene
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Eugene Chang
>> IEEE Life Senior Member
>> IEEE Communications Society, Computer Society, & Signal Processing Society,
>> Hawaii Chapter Chair
>> IEEE Life Member Affinity Group Hawaii Chair
>> IEEE Entrepreneurship, Mentor
>> eugene.chang@ieee.org
>> m 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Jun 3, 2024, at 11:16 AM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is a fallback that will only be if there is no other coverage, and will be a poor data rate.
>>>
>>> I would expect that the impact to the phone battery would be less than the phone continually searching for a tower
>>>
>>> Also, SpaceX has pushed back, according to them this isn't observed interference with their signals, instead they reconfigured a satellite to the direct-to-phone frequencies and were able to detect them
>>>
>>> we'll see what the real story is.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 3 Jun 2024, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink wrote:
>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 10:47:32 -1000
>>>> From: Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>>>
>>>> Reply-To: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org <mailto:eugene.chang@ieee.org> <mailto:eugene.chang@ieee.org <mailto:eugene.chang@ieee.org>>>
>>>> To: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com> <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>>>
>>>> Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>>>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] SpaceX/Starlink says it's ready for a fall
>>>> satellite-to-cell service with T-Mobile
>>>> I found this line in the article very interesting: The larger 2nd generation SpaceX satellites can connect to the majority of T-Mobile’s 4G and 5G phones over its 1900 MHz spectrum.
>>>>
>>>> It is exciting a subscriber does not need to buy a new phone.
>>>> What is the expected impact to the phone’s battery life?
>>>> Any speculations?
>>>>
>>>> Gene
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>> Eugene Chang
>>>> eugene.chang@ieee.org <mailto:eugene.chang@ieee.org>
>>>> o 781-799-0233
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 3, 2024, at 8:08 AM, Frantisek Borsik via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> SpaceX & T-Mobile intend to launch direct-to-device (D2D) satellite servicethis fall
>>>>> An analyst told us that will give them an 18- to 24-month lead over some rivals
>>>>> AT&T & Verizon are still backing AST SpaceMobile as an alternative
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile <https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile><https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile <https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile>><https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile <https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile><https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile <https://www.fierce-network.com/wireless/space-x-says-its-ready-fall-direct-satellite-cell-service-t-mobile>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik <https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik <https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik <https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik <https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik>>>
>>>>> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
>>>>>
>>>>> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
>>>>>
>>>>> Skype: casioa5302ca
>>>>>
>>>>> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com> <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>> <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com><mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com <mailto:frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>> Starlink mailing list
>>>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>>
>>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlink mailing list
>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>>
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 17881 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 18:08 Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-03 18:17 ` the keyboard of geoff goodfellow
2024-06-04 12:32 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-03 20:47 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-03 21:16 ` David Lang
2024-06-03 21:57 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-03 21:59 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-03 22:41 ` David Lang
2024-06-04 0:13 ` Eugene Y Chang [this message]
2024-06-04 0:54 ` David Lang
2024-06-04 11:20 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-04 11:43 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-04 11:54 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-04 13:11 ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-06-04 18:10 ` David Lang
2024-06-04 18:51 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-04 18:58 ` Michael Richardson
2024-06-04 23:01 ` Mike Puchol
2024-06-05 3:17 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 4:16 ` Mike Puchol
2024-06-05 4:26 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 4:47 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-05 6:12 ` Mike Puchol
2024-06-05 7:03 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 11:30 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-04 10:42 David Fernández
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F548B50-D476-4E54-B18E-3418978105CE@ieee.org \
--to=eugene.chang@ieee.org \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox