Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu>
To: Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com>
Cc: Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu>,
	David Lang <david@lang.hm>,
	Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2023 23:04:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4108AD1D-235D-4243-8AAD-2155DAC6D68A@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK2MWOuHbCHVNyY86g3UyfNZPSziDgNKmyyoDRi18zGMDgAeEQ@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1791 bytes --]

I found this YouTube of a deluge system test.
It doesn’t look like it uses enough water to succeed.
My intuition is the mass of water needed is approximately equal to the rocket’s mass.
Maybe the system doesn’t have to fully absorb the momentum of the engine exhaust. Still, 70% would be a much greater mass than what the video shows.

Has anyone seen a rough calculation of what is needed from the deluge system?
Some elements
mass of water to absorb/dissipate the thermal energy
mass of water to absorb/dissipate the momentum of the rocket exhaust.
the rocket engine exhaust momentum is greater than the weight of the rocket.

Are there tricks that I don’t know about?

Gene
-----------------------------------
Eugene Chang
eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu
+1-781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)





> On Apr 25, 2023, at 12:31 PM, Bruce Perens <bruce@perens.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 7:20 PM David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>> wrote:
> If they dig a pool under the Starship Launch Mount, it will fill with water
> (they are already having to pump water out of the hole the rocket dug), if they
> line it with concrete, water will seep through, and the concrete will try to
> float on the water.
> 
> The deluge system produces a mixture of water and air. That is necessary for the acoustic deadening effect.
> 
> Once upon a time, there was a thing called Orion, which was supposed to be a big heavy shield that would be propelled into space by setting off atomic bombs on one side of it. Lots and lots of bombs. At some point people thought they could make a shield good enough. What SpaceX puts in now is going to be the closest we have come to Orion, just upside down.


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 13488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-25 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-24 14:12 Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:16 ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:27   ` Dave Taht
2023-04-24 15:37     ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-24 15:49       ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-24 19:03   ` David Lang
2023-04-24 19:16 ` David Lang
2023-04-25  0:46   ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-25  2:20     ` David Lang
2023-04-25 22:31       ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-25 23:04         ` Eugene Chang [this message]
2023-04-25 23:22           ` David Lang
2023-04-25 23:55             ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-26 19:14         ` Michael Richardson
2023-04-25  1:01 ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 19:29 ` Dave Taht
2023-04-26 20:05   ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-04-26 20:41   ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 21:05     ` Eugene Y Chang
2023-04-26 22:15       ` Mark Handley
2023-04-26 22:29         ` [Starlink] Fondag Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 22:32           ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 22:35           ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-26 23:09             ` Nathan Owens
2023-04-27  3:42             ` David Lang
2023-04-26 21:10     ` [Starlink] some post Starship launch thoughts Dave Taht
2023-04-26 21:26       ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-26 22:31       ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-26 22:38         ` Bruce Perens
2023-04-26 23:25         ` Eugene Chang
2023-04-27  3:44         ` David Lang
2023-04-27 14:09           ` Rodney W. Grimes
2023-04-24 16:02 David Fernández
     [not found] <mailman.798.1682383621.1222.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2023-04-25 20:40 ` David P. Reed
2023-04-25 21:31   ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:37     ` David Lang
2023-05-11 16:24       ` Sauli Kiviranta
2023-04-25 22:33   ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4108AD1D-235D-4243-8AAD-2155DAC6D68A@alum.mit.edu \
    --to=eugene.chang@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=bruce@perens.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox