From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C59723B2A4 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 07:32:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1657798373; bh=KyUl0IkEN8xP8XXNqT1a2MXwf8vb1vusA90A/ck6Zm8=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=a5hH7/KA68D7XF1K4BYi936/llDIYHpRgjwv4G/HuLvakB0eIJg77mhBYq7k9SDTP gN01UIjXMPVBjbbqJePrMvl2x59VY+nQACS0VORPVU1AGZeirrGnUAys3/47o/Trvs 3XO/SaMn0pZMKDdzz40Xtlw4WSAPU1xcotpF1cz8= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from smtpclient.apple ([134.76.241.253]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MatRT-1nZa8M0kmp-00cT8o; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 13:32:53 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.100.31\)) From: Sebastian Moeller In-Reply-To: <841ca6dc-d6d3-46ab-87c0-d6bcaa31533b@Spark> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 13:32:51 +0200 Cc: Larry Press , David Lang , Dave Taht via Starlink Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <42D3F3C5-C1B3-48EA-8C45-2540ACD787E4@gmx.de> References: <20220713173602.0582c9b3@spidey.rellim.com> <92n4s129-6r15-7q75-7293-qpo73q298srn@ynat.uz> <841ca6dc-d6d3-46ab-87c0-d6bcaa31533b@Spark> To: Mike Puchol X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.100.31) X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:SFJ4y/H7K7ixcGj+BeRUCYe9O9wbqi1MLdg1RvPUe4qwwmDxTB0 pHNOOkXKyjvvPdt25Xkpz3TloAojhzv0UKlkjh4B8+azounCwwDHZZ+oIQNf6LvpCSSvhey t2TwSDf/ON2XOs+LGvxbTcOWsF2BmhZNSVhG3SIvksWweid801PLw5T3mvAfFZcoa8hCPuq lP0o+lqnuZ/5i6n3M2OdQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ImYRTz99KFI=:p/4lmnFwg5a5T7KDrGrkUa IKABPesEKcUGWDgviB2I9uXVqScqKUYzj3cUrrVzPIwD44DNZ4db65vHN8enKoAKrei3jaKzt gwL1BYwScLU9HCbhl9/AocJeVwlDNdJqrO061u32e1U/ACY33XYL3Szb0Duhvzrf7kRawdRW9 p0K0mjkA/Qr3xvp4NNJSx9lwEi3oOJKcH608DSI79660FPzh6s5MJvbitoWpzRqMPqNr6XfWX DFalt/PtSO/4PrmzcaAS0ldzNN+6d1bbZnb6JOc7scqgHqcFHry7RumdvaNtp3NmRaS3fGsZo 1MOQ4gLhXh9weZIcLFZPYodQyUlp3Xm+C1wODZ49TT4edA/J3f7fxD+Ox8iXQnZOR+E8UmPvL qrtmoALoq9yexN3Ju0PwtcEnPHRXiAK+YS36NTOO30T+HrQyarPolXpo+tTNEmHMcIR0pa/Ra PbaCyOY3zD/DJ2fn/IHWilAbHiN5KNNcZ8HA6vjIaKSSFVMmxZqMYMYDVHlnzg1fHs40ENnM6 0PodatawoyzE65Z1njjXdD7henHTc0rQEtwKSCQHjWv8sbjkVNfMo5llYAEQTDNTQOhp7qdLO /TbMtdxY3ymA7MH7FSGY88nPAXWw1NSF/M4HU2eK3VJvtnqB5lB3uxEmaTEU3FHQgYUO7KCh/ SwFqmsMNIQs9wSyY4gEbk6MCMcNHGCRd2jCxsDsT+JS71Q4GLs7c6Y0rYiPusAfullNSgRgJ1 IKZicTLwipd/c1XIfhvZMOvDHgl7JG/hyCucBSjxIgFpQSWCBeM08PpTmzr1OeiQeRhj2YDGn 5uWyYa9G5RX41B/HTBJZI0on9oev2s3ykhHFCxQHqxO1CK2LVz5AndCE+Zt4oj9B5i/YCFxMr NkV7XbDLttK8UgYhC1N0XAOdgLqtISQXhiBY+FubBoQIQ/nnby5i+xldnpp8q2ColK8nValzu uvAeD17wkUnPwfECmEcDBF8L0p2S6Ba0sOi+sacrsZIFJQe5VrJD4kzf/ub6IyUJ5WAHzgQAv v8Uj8vkJB6b8x/J4s5LeGrDP625dFSPGC4ZSgbZeGOZouvZJyH7t158Ev5ogXpRx5fGzpqCwM 4r5pfEA3hPLKSiVmBWDVVOIUg0bnA7KFjmHv4F8WR53Qrcn2wbWXkTDcw== Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:33:00 -0000 Hi Mike, > On Jul 14, 2022, at 13:15, Mike Puchol via Starlink = wrote: >=20 > On the multiple terminals, I have verified that the duty cycle of a = consumer terminal is 14%, thus, you could have 7 terminals on a single = uplink channel with some guard time.=20 Could you elaborate how that works.how the terminals will be = interleaved in that situation? Regards Sebastian > I have seen 30 Mbps up, so you=E2=80=99d be able to push 210 Mbps in = uplink, or a spectral efficiency of about 3.4 bps/Hz.