From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [204.42.254.5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E1FF3B2A4
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:40:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown
 [IPv6:2602:fe55:64:0:4d3:3d65:f49f:d238])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD3915403B6;
 Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:39:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:39:55 -0400
Message-Id: <4DBD594E-7D33-4400-8E9F-3A51652B8B3C@puck.nether.net>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Subject: [Starlink] Alternate
X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:40:09 -0000

Akamai.webex.com/meet/jared

Since the other isn=E2=80=99t working if you want to continue.

If you don=E2=80=99t know what I=E2=80=99m talking about, it=E2=80=99s =
ok, safe to ignore.

- Jared