From: Daniel AJ Sokolov <daniel@sokolov.eu.org>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink and bufferbloat status?
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:07:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c973572-ab02-2424-c246-6607b8cd6dfe@sokolov.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2107091556260.1440203@qynat-yncgbc>
On 2021-07-09 at 3:58 p.m., David Lang wrote:
> IIRC, the definition of 'low latency' for the FCC was something like
> 100ms, and Musk was predicting <40ms.
Indeed, the Rural Digital Opportunity Fund Auction defined "Low Latency"
as "<100 ms", and "High Latency" as "≤ 750 ms & MOS of ≥4".
MOS is the Mean Opinion Score, which takes latency and jitter into
account. For "Low Latency", jitter/MOS was not defined. MOS goes from 1
(Bad) to 5 (Excellent).
https://www.fcc.gov/auction/904/factsheet
FYI
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-09 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3.1625846401.13780.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2021-07-09 18:40 ` David P. Reed
2021-07-09 18:45 ` Nathan Owens
2021-07-09 19:08 ` Ben Greear
2021-07-09 20:08 ` Dick Roy
2021-07-09 22:58 ` David Lang
2021-07-09 23:07 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov [this message]
2021-07-10 15:58 ` Dave Taht
2021-07-16 10:21 ` Wheelock, Ian
2021-07-16 17:08 ` David Lang
2021-07-16 17:13 ` Nathan Owens
2021-07-16 17:24 ` David Lang
2021-07-16 17:29 ` Nathan Owens
2021-07-16 17:31 ` Mike Puchol
2021-07-16 17:35 ` Nathan Owens
2021-07-16 17:39 ` Jonathan Bennett
2021-07-19 1:05 ` Nick Buraglio
2021-07-19 1:20 ` David Lang
2021-07-19 1:34 ` Nick Buraglio
2021-07-17 18:36 ` David P. Reed
2021-07-17 18:42 ` David Lang
2021-07-18 19:05 ` David Lang
2021-07-16 17:38 ` David Lang
2021-07-16 17:42 ` Mike Puchol
2021-07-16 18:48 ` David Lang
2021-07-16 20:57 ` Mike Puchol
2021-07-16 21:30 ` David Lang
2021-07-16 21:40 ` Mike Puchol
2021-07-16 22:40 ` Jeremy Austin
2021-07-16 23:04 ` Nathan Owens
2021-07-17 10:02 ` [Starlink] Free Space Optics - was " Michiel Leenaars
2021-07-17 1:12 ` [Starlink] " David Lang
[not found] ` <d86d6590b6f24dfa8f9775ed3bb3206c@DM6PR05MB5915.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
2021-07-17 15:55 ` Fabian E. Bustamante
2021-07-16 20:51 ` Michael Richardson
2021-07-18 19:17 ` David Lang
2021-07-18 22:29 ` Dave Taht
2021-07-19 1:30 ` David Lang
2021-07-19 12:14 ` Michael Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c973572-ab02-2424-c246-6607b8cd6dfe@sokolov.eu.org \
--to=daniel@sokolov.eu.org \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox