Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Brandon Butterworth <brandon-ml@bogons.net>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	 Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] lumen orbit
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 16:52:01 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4n7s5s50-12n0-n4q4-3978-0qr743n043o9@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <embaf16fb0-0d93-483e-90d0-e17e5ea9e300@135aa14c.com>

On Wed, 4 Sep 2024, Brandon Butterworth via Starlink wrote:

> On 04/09/2024 15:48:51, "Dave Taht via Starlink" 
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>> They plan to build a 5GW 4k solar square for data centers in orbit,
>> launched on starship:
>>
>> https://www.lumenorbit.com/
>
> Maintenance call outs are going to be interesting
>
>> How are they going to cool this thing?
>
> With some big radiators. From
> https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/473486main_iss_atcs_overview.pdf
>
> it seems that the ISS units take about 23 * 3.5m area for 35kW so
> about 440 W/m^2, if they are about the same then 5GW will need
> around 11 million sq metres.
>
> That seems a totally unfeasible number so either I messed up the
> calculation, or they have way more efficient radiators than NASA,
> or this is wishful thinking/investor grift.

the efficiency of radiators goes up drastically as the temperature of the 
radiator goes up (there is a T^4 factor in the equasion, T in kelvin) so if they 
can get the coolant hot enough, they can shrink the radiator area by increasing 
the temp.

but since 0c = ~273K, running the temp up to just over the melting 
point of aluminum would let you get to about 1000x efficiency for the radiators 
(@1255c) but would still need a massive radiator. 11k sq meters is still a lot. 
the ISS radiators are a little of 6Kg/sq meter, so you are up to around 70T 
worth of radiators (possible with a starship, but still massive)

designing a heat pump that can pump heat from chips into molten aluminum is left 
as an excercise for the reader :-)

David Lang

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-04 23:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-04 14:48 Dave Taht
2024-09-04 14:56 ` tom
2024-09-04 15:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-09-04 15:02   ` Dave Cohen
2024-09-04 23:12 ` Brandon Butterworth
2024-09-04 23:52   ` David Lang [this message]
2024-09-05  0:07     ` David Lang
2024-09-05 17:58     ` Michael Richardson
2024-09-05 19:37       ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-09-05 20:18         ` Brandon Butterworth
2024-09-06  4:31           ` Dave Taht
2024-09-08 14:01             ` Dave Taht
2024-09-08 16:21               ` Michael Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4n7s5s50-12n0-n4q4-3978-0qr743n043o9@ynat.uz \
    --to=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=brandon-ml@bogons.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox