From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F3663B2A4
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu,  3 Mar 2022 10:15:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69])
 by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id E979F1244F3;
 Thu,  3 Mar 2022 07:15:11 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 07:15:11 -0800 (PST)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
cc: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, 
 "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4yeAATtAiip7wQxCUryuBA4TL1U2NkCEBzWjB=htrepA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <531qo367-1n76-1668-4n54-2o8nspps382@ynat.uz>
References: <CAA93jw7e-OxPnSy5SUpf2G+xk_vSRurLwczo+Eva-0nPQoR-Ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <DC1714AA-CB8B-432D-94C1-93C94AFFF612@cable.comcast.com>
 <CAA93jw4yeAATtAiip7wQxCUryuBA4TL1U2NkCEBzWjB=htrepA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY=0000000000005033ca05d9515318
Content-ID: <98p3q0n-769o-9898-36or-p363p850801o@ynat.uz>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] recent starlink rrul test result
X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2022 15:15:13 -0000

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--0000000000005033ca05d9515318
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Content-ID: <6r348288-nn98-s1s4-rps3-np9op0n01r58@ynat.uz>

That said, I've been using starlink for work zoom calls for a while with no 
significant issues (nothing I can pin on my side vs the other participants)

David Lang

On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Dave Taht wrote:

> wildly variable bandwidth, adjusted at 15 sec intervals, induced
> latencies of 400ms, really terrible upload throughput relative to
> down.
>
> H/T David Lang for this data.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:31 AM Livingood, Jason
> <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
>>
>> When folks experience sub-par video conferencing over Starlink, it'd be great to see working latency stats at that time - such as via the easy test at https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat.
>>
>> On 2/23/22, 09:38, "Starlink on behalf of Dave Taht" <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net on behalf of dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://blog.tomevslin.com/2022/02/starlinks-zoomready-rating-is-going-down.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj8WTA26WA$
>>
>>     --
>>     I tried to build a better future, a few times:
>>     https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.icei.org__;JSUl!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj-yqmwsLA$
>>
>>     Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Starlink mailing list
>>     Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>     https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj_SP7yVhg$
>>
>
>
>
--0000000000005033ca05d9515318--