Re: [Starlink] VPN woes, recommendations?

[David Lang <david@lang.hm>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]

On Fri, 17 Feb 2023, Adam Thompson via Starlink wrote:

> First, having multiple devices in serial is generally not a great idea for reliability.  Can we realistically plug our remote AP directly into the dish, still?  (This is using Starlink Business, FWIW.). I know we lose access to the Starlink app, but we also lose a NATing router and an unwanted wifi AP, so that's probably a net zero.  I just don't know what other dangers/problems that topology might cause.

look at youtube for people running their starlink on 12v, it requires cutting 
the cable and putting normal ends on it, but once you do that (and have a PoE 
power injector) you can connect a normal router to a starlink dish

I haven't heard of anyone doing this for the larger dish, but for the standard 
one it's quite common.

The dish then gives you a 192.168.1 IP address (and only one, so you still have 
your router NAT and dish NAT involved)

David Lang

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink