From: Robert McMahon <rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com>
To: "Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical a spects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
dickroy@alum.mit.edu,
Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:46:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55037f9a-bc2c-4bbb-a4bb-47ad30f16190@rjmcmahon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJUtOOi_-OsgRPSLvCV0UpDCQjv+R61uf02fxYW1PbkEQy4hqA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3468 bytes --]
I think this common in that appointment of commissioners go through a political process. The FCC has a technology group, too. When I worked with them about 8 years ago, they had skilled researchers on staff and a highly skilled director. They asked good questions about engineering decisions, like what is limiting the number of mimo streams on devices.
Their physical facility is a bit dated, and they don't get stock grants. I respect the engineers I worked with for what they did.
Bob
On Dec 13, 2023, 2:38 PM, at 2:38 PM, Frantisek Borsik via Nnagain <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>I would love for Nathan to be here with us, and comment on that :-) so
>I
>will add NN list as well.
>
>
>All the best,
>
>Frank
>Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>
>https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
>iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
>Skype: casioa5302ca
>frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
>
>
>On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 11:21 PM, Richard Roy <dickroy3777@comcast.net>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* Starlink [mailto:starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On
>> Behalf Of *Frantisek Borsik via Starlink
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2023 1:26 PM
>> *To:* Dave Taht via Starlink
>> *Subject:* [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink’s RDOF
>Application
>>
>>
>>
>> “*Elon Musk*’s Starlink was not the only major company to inflate its
>> capabilities
>>
><https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2021/04/rdof-reverse-auction-criticized-google-makes-pandemic-gains-california-broadband-access-for-k-12/>
>in
>> RDOF bids. Nearly 100 bidders have defaulted since the auction,
>leaving in
>> limbo an estimated $2.8 billion
>>
><https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/06/what-happens-to-the-estimated-2-8-billion-in-rdof-defaults/>
>of
>> the $9.2 billion originally awarded.
>>
>>
>>
>> The FCC upheld another denial
>>
><https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-proposes-22-million-fine-against-ltd-over-rdof/>
>> on Monday in the case of LTD Broadband, which appealed the
>commission’s
>> finding that it could not reasonably serve the more than 500,000
>locations
>> to which it had committed. The commission also hit LTD with a $21.7
>million
>> fine for its default.
>>
>> The commission’s two Republicans dissented to Starlink’s denial,
>claiming
>> they saw a path for the company to improve its speeds before the
>first
>> deployment deadline in 2025.”
>>
>> *[RR] The reason two lawyers “saw a path” is because they were
>> bribed/conned into to see it. In my nearly 50years of experience
>dealing
>> with the FCC, extremely rarely are the people at the top in the
>commission
>> tech savvy. In general, they have NO CLUE when it comes to
>technology …
>> period! **JJ*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-upholds-denial-of-starlinks-rdof-application/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Frank
>> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>>
>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
>> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
>> Skype: casioa5302ca
>> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Nnagain mailing list
>Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
>https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12008 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 21:25 [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink’s " Frantisek Borsik
[not found] ` <A8DC9114A92F47D5AAE1D332B5E5007D@SRA6>
2023-12-13 22:38 ` [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's " Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-14 2:46 ` Robert McMahon [this message]
2023-12-14 6:11 ` [Starlink] [NNagain] " Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-14 17:48 ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-14 18:47 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-14 18:51 ` Nathan Simington
2023-12-14 19:44 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-15 12:07 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 12:37 ` Gert Doering
2023-12-15 12:43 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 12:44 ` Gert Doering
2023-12-15 12:46 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-15 13:24 ` Gert Doering
2023-12-15 13:40 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-15 18:06 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 18:51 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 19:13 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 21:29 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 21:42 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:04 ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-15 22:10 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:13 ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-15 22:33 ` Kenline, Doug
2023-12-15 22:36 ` Dave Taht
2023-12-19 19:33 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 22:05 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 22:13 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:26 ` Dave Taht
2023-12-16 4:16 ` David Lang
2023-12-16 17:30 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-16 18:48 ` Robert McMahon
2023-12-16 21:44 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-16 22:28 ` Robert McMahon
2023-12-17 0:25 ` Dave Taht
2023-12-23 21:17 ` J Pan
2023-12-18 8:25 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 15:46 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-12-17 17:32 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-17 18:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-16 8:15 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 13:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-16 8:09 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-16 11:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-17 1:54 ` [Starlink] other fcc services at sea Dave Taht
2023-12-16 13:03 [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application David Fernández
2023-12-18 8:09 ` David Lang
2023-12-16 14:33 David Fernández
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55037f9a-bc2c-4bbb-a4bb-47ad30f16190@rjmcmahon.com \
--to=rjmcmahon@rjmcmahon.com \
--cc=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox