Re: [Starlink] ordered my dishy!!

[Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1839 bytes --]

In terms of power usage, most of it is used to drive the phased array, in terms of each individual IC in the array, plus the computational side of determining what each element should be doing, at very high frequency. The terminal consumes more power in receive mode than transmit, funnily enough - because it needs to do more “driving” in order to create a receive spot beam.

The only way to truly save power would be to decrease the duty cycles, essentially, place Dishy in “sleep” mode for a period of time each slot.

Best,

Mike
On Jun 25, 2021, 4:32 AM +0200, Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io>, wrote:
> That seems like a pretty good deal, only a small additional price (+5% to the service price) to pay for the ability to get high speed, (mostly) low latency connection where previously not possible. I think it’s pretty impressive they got a phased array which transmits >500km down to 65W.
>
> —Nathan
>
>
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 8:16 PM Daniel AJ Sokolov <daniel@sokolov.eu.org> wrote:
> > > On 2021-06-24 at 6:36 p.m., Nathan Owens wrote:
> > > > The newer dish model pulls closer to 65-70W, fwiw. Might pull more in snow
> > > > melt mode
> > >
> > > That is still significant. About 600 kWh a year, which would cost me
> > > about USD 66.
> > >
> > > Plus all the electricity required for snow/ice melt - of which I'll need
> > > a lot, given that I live North of 60°.
> > >
> > > YMMV, depending on your cost of electricity.
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Starlink mailing list
> > > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2985 bytes --]