Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN

[Keith Simonsen <blakangel@gmail.com>]

On 1/21/2025 7:22 AM, David Lang wrote:
> b. angel wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> I gave up on open VPN and starlink a while ago. I've implemented 
>> wireguard
>> tunnels with success and reliability.
>
> did you end up having to do anything with MTU? Did you use TCP or UDP 
> for your transport?
It's UDP only. Standard wireguard config. I have links using PFSense to 
PFSense, Mikrotik to PFSense and Mikrotik Mikrotik all with good 
performance and months long reliability. Both permanent site-site 
circuits and "road warrior" style.

In PFSense when you set up a wireguard interface it sets the MTU to 1420 
and MSS to 1380. This depends on your WAN link of course.

If your clients are needing OpenVPN you can make a "jumpbox" to 
terminate the Starlink wireguard circuits and set up an OpenVPN server 
routing to them. I've implemented this setup for one location.

>
> David Lang
Keith
>
>> Keith
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025, 23:25 David Lang via Starlink <
>> starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>>> has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if they
>>> got the
>>> connectors to completely bypass the router)?
>>>
>>> I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems 
>>> trying to
>>> get
>>> openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to the
>>> router on
>>> the starlink side)
>>>
>>> the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when 
>>> trying
>>> UDP,
>>> when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starlink
>>> side (st
>>> least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to work
>>>
>>> David Lang
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlink mailing list
>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>>
>>