From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCF03B2A4 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 06:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 38FAwqgF041682 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:58:52 +0200 Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C597203FA9 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:58:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121A0203E1F for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:58:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.8.32.70] (is156570.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.70]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 38FAwpfl005281 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:58:52 +0200 Message-ID: <6244255c-f9c5-490c-b740-38353af2e60a@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 12:58:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: fr To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Alexandre Petrescu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] Measuring a Low-Earth-Orbit Satellite Network X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:58:53 -0000 Le 17/08/2023 à 18:42, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 7:47 AM Dave Taht wrote: >> This paper, at first glance, looks really, really good, measuring >> detailed topology of the starlink network: >> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 >> >> Thank you J Pan for passing it along! > More recent data here: > https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/15p76j4/impressive_improvement_in_three_months_no_longer/ Sorry but I do not understand the graphs.  The URL sounds great. For my part, I can tell that I follow one particular sat chosen arbitrarily (STARLINK-6064) on a public database since some weeks now and it keeps at around 360km altitude.   That is much lower than 500-or-so usual.  Maybe it is that lower altitude that permits a higher performance (lower latencies). (there are other sats even lower, but not sure whether they're there in error or on their way up). Alex > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> From: J Pan >> Date: Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 11:02 PM >> Subject: starlink >> To: dave.taht@gmail.com >> >> >> Hi Dave: thanks for your libreqos work. did you see >> https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.06863 ? cheers. -j >> -- >> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~pan >> >> >> -- >> Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg >> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos > >