From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF273B2A4 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 23:06:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id C764010FE5A; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 20:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 20:06:24 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: Dave Taht cc: David Lang , Mike Puchol , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <62559784-r419-8p31-9710-20ro1425168q@ynat.uz> References: <28034.1635270711@localhost> <8007.1635359366@localhost> <305pr7or-sp7o-n2q5-8016-q7755o67n88@ynat.uz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Starlink] thinking about the laser links again X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 03:06:30 -0000 On Thu, 28 Oct 2021, Dave Taht wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:51 PM David Lang wrote: >> >> As a stunt, I think they will be able to do it fairly soon, using the satellites > > It would be a great stunt. Even with a few ground hops along the way, > they should still be able to establish a speed record. I wasn't thinking about this approach, I was talking about the possibility of using satellites launched for polar coverage, go from New York north along one string of satellites, and then back south along another string. That only takes a couple strings in orbit, just wiht the right timing (which is why I called it a stunt version) David Lang