From: Ulrich Speidel <u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] one dish per household is silly.
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 09:34:19 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <66d7dc64-1b8e-4629-8ffb-6ab2d14d48fb@auckland.ac.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1389497-7980-4c82-bbf2-eff46845929c@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4363 bytes --]
Caution - 250 kW peak sounds more like a horror movie (around 500 W
average powers your average household) but there's an easy explanation.
It's also a good example for why Reddit isn't a good source of
information unless you know and can interpret what it is that you're
looking at. The figures you've seen are almost certainly EIRP ones
(effective isotropically radiated power). And EIRP ain't the same as
power consumption.
Simple example: Take a 100 W light bulb that radiates more or less
isotropically (same amount of light power in all directions) without any
reflectors etc. When you look at that light bulb, you see 100 W EIRP.
Put a mirror behind the lightbulb, so you now see the bulb and its
reflection, which looks like two bulbs. Makes 200 W EIRP, but it doesn't
increase your power bill. A simple mirror like that has a gain of 3 dBi.
At a Ku band frequency of 18 GHz, a 1.5 m diameter parabolic dish has a
gain of over 48 dBi. Each 3 dBi step in there effectively doubles the
number of transmitters you see reflected to you if you're the receiver.
48 dBi means 16 such steps. So you have to divide the EIRP of something
like this by the "2^16" reflections that this gives you. If you're
having 250 kW EIRP, then the actual transmit power is just a few watts,
and similarly your power consumption is a lot more modest.
Another way of looking at this is that what goes up (to the satellite in
terms of bits) has to come down (to another ground station / dishy).
That happens via a similar path. So if you'd transmit to a satellite
with anything like even 25 kW actual transmitter power, you'd also need
a similar amount of transmit power at the satellite to downlink. And
you'd have to generate that power up there in orbit. Now I have solar
PV, and I know that generating a measly 5 kW peak takes 20 panels of
around 2 sqm size each. Generating the sort of power you'd need to
transmit at 25 kW would require solar arrays on the satellite that are
more like the size of a football field. Ballpark.
Thankfully EIRP for a dish of fixed size goes up as a linear function of
dish diameter and transmit frequency as the antenna becomes more
"pointed" as you move from conventional C band to the Ku and Ka bands
used by Starlink.
On 14/11/2023 5:22 am, Inemesit Affia via Starlink wrote:
> You have to size power equipment for max power plus a percentage
> regardless of current traffic needs.
>
> Look for the ANATEL docs on Reddit you'll see it there(per dish at
> least). Or search the NASASpaceflight forum.
>
> I think it's 250kw peak. Could be 25kw instead can't remember right.
> But each dish is more than 5kw and there's other equipment than dishes
>
> Nov 13, 2023 5:10:27 PM J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>:
>
> is the power consumption related to traffic volume? currently the
> traffic is very light
> https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/17k3jas/intergs_ground_station_satellite_links_much/
> <https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/17k3jas/intergs_ground_station_satellite_links_much/>
>
> --
> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA,
> Web.UVic.CA/~pan
> <http://Web.UVic.CA/~pan>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:40 PM Inemesit Affia via Starlink
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>
> It's kinda expensive to run. Likely 75KW peak.
>
> Check the power requirements for a regular gateway and divide
> by two.
>
> Might be useful for Taiwanese Islands though
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
--
****************************************************************
Dr. Ulrich Speidel
School of Computer Science
Room 303S.594 (City Campus)
The University of Auckland
u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/
****************************************************************
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 6762 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-13 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-10 11:44 Dave Taht
2023-11-10 12:21 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-11-11 4:42 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-10 12:33 ` [Starlink] [NNagain] " Bill Woodcock
2023-11-10 12:55 ` Dave Taht
2023-11-10 13:17 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-10 13:44 ` David Lang
2023-11-10 15:10 ` Dave Taht
2023-11-10 16:09 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-10 16:40 ` David Lang
2023-11-10 16:58 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-10 18:16 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-10 13:53 ` Dave Taht
2023-11-11 4:50 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-10 16:11 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-10 13:51 ` [Starlink] " David Lang
2023-11-13 6:37 ` J Pan
2023-11-13 6:40 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-11-13 16:10 ` J Pan
2023-11-13 16:22 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-11-13 20:34 ` Ulrich Speidel [this message]
2023-11-13 20:38 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-11-13 20:42 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-11-14 4:57 ` J Pan
2023-11-14 5:13 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-11-14 5:18 ` J Pan
2023-11-14 9:04 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-11-14 8:50 ` Alexandre Petrescu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=66d7dc64-1b8e-4629-8ffb-6ab2d14d48fb@auckland.ac.nz \
--to=u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox