From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C663A3B29E
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  8 Sep 2023 13:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69])
 by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97901A9E33;
 Fri,  8 Sep 2023 10:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 10:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5sJ6M=g04DT93=YWimzNrZWdUrFu5GvmYEmt21NWvB5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <67ppo4pn-9450-7564-3p0q-4qr449743q3s@ynat.uz>
References: <CAA93jw5sJ6M=g04DT93=YWimzNrZWdUrFu5GvmYEmt21NWvB5Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="===============0661592032871726331=="
Subject: Re: [Starlink] cross layer queue management
X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2023 17:46:55 -0000

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--===============0661592032871726331==
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII

On Fri, 8 Sep 2023, Dave Taht via Starlink wrote:

> How likely is it for this reconfiguration interval to remain a thing?

given the realities of orbital mechanics, I expect periodic reconfiguration to 
be a permanent fixture of LEO connections. The period may change (when lower 
orbits start being used) so it may not be the predictable 15 min interval it is 
today.

getting ntpd on the dishy would be fantastic.

David Lang
--===============0661592032871726331==
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
Content-ID: <ro8s90n6-s2qp-5924-4rso-qp0pr50qsr4p@ynat.uz>
Content-Description: 
Content-Disposition: INLINE

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KU3Rhcmxpbmsg
bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0ClN0YXJsaW5rQGxpc3RzLmJ1ZmZlcmJsb2F0Lm5ldApodHRwczovL2xpc3Rz
LmJ1ZmZlcmJsb2F0Lm5ldC9saXN0aW5mby9zdGFybGluawo=

--===============0661592032871726331==--