From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nextlayer.at (smtp2.nextlayer.at [IPv6:2a01:190:1764:150::37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 586383B29E for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 04:16:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.50] (d50-117-149-147.yt.northwestel.net [50.117.149.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nextlayer.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3294C8079AB for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:16:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.nextlayer.at 3294C8079AB Message-ID: <6822e8d6-479a-c657-71d9-54d0f824fa92@falco.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 02:16:33 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Content-Language: en-CA, de-AT To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink as Cellular Backup X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 09:16:37 -0000 On 2022-12-02 at 01:19, David Fernández via Starlink wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > You may be interested on this paper: > https://www.researchgate.net/publication/365488929_Concept_and_Evaluation_Of_5G_Backhauling_via_Starlink > > Looking at figure 9, I understand that you can serve up to 50 > simultaneous users with a Starlink dish as backhaul, more or less, > before calls quality starts degrading for everybody. Interesting. In some areas, this will be enough for a mobile tower. (Also, there is a more powerful business version of Starlink now.) BR Daniel AJ