From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD68F3CB41
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 10:10:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown
 [IPv6:2607:fb90:888c:12b3:fc16:86a4:895e:97f9])
 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)
 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
 (No client certificate requested)
 by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3B8654022C;
 Sat, 26 Jun 2021 10:10:06 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <CALjsLJvfnSD8X7UuPzZKdvKOtOS0kqdVm7uwDMUFGWsQMrcVaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 10:09:48 -0400
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Message-Id: <7664DBDE-5049-498A-9C40-4CF17FA2D488@puck.nether.net>
References: <CALjsLJvfnSD8X7UuPzZKdvKOtOS0kqdVm7uwDMUFGWsQMrcVaQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18F72)
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink throughput / bufferbloat change?
X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 14:10:18 -0000

I will be able to test perhaps in 6-10 hours as I'll be getting the system o=
nline hopefully.=20

Sent from my TI-99/4a

> On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io> wrote:
>=20
> =EF=BB=BF
> I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton of testing, but it seems like in the l=
ast ~2 days, my DL speeds are lower (<160Mbps, generally 90-110Mbps), but do=
wnload-induced bufferbloat is also greatly reduced (Latency generally <60ms,=
 with small spikes up to maybe 150ms more rarely  -- much better than to up t=
o 400ms I was seeing before).
>=20
> I confirmed the same behavior with one other list member, has anyone else s=
een similar?=20
>=20
> --Nathan=20
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink