Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrich Speidel <u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Portability Now Available (fwd)
Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 19:40:01 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <77f03647-c1af-00c3-21b6-19fc62a81e44@auckland.ac.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <r5906n19-7r3-ssn9-5277-7p8qs5302968@ynat.uz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3603 bytes --]

Cool. Very interesting! That's one pile of information all of a sudden. 
They could do that more often IMHO.

Nothing like official confirmation that the tropics are an almost 
Starlink-free zone, and that places reasonably away from the 53rd 
parallels are secondary service zones. They forgot their 50-odd 
terminals in Tonga (I heard yesterday about someone in the northern 
islands who brought a dishy from overseas and found it didn't work... 
obviously believed the headlines... sigh).

Also interesting that there seems to be, finally, some sort of 
disclosure on cell size. Someone will need to explain to me why there 
are waitlist areas in the Auckland area surrounded by full service. The 
areas concerned are rural, which you'd think they'd want to service with 
priority over our well-connected CBD... Too many subscribers there 
already, or not enough to warrant a spot beam? Similar soft spots near 
Sydney, holes in Foveaux Strait, the Hauraki Gulf, southeast of Murray 
Bridge in South Australia, southern Chile, ... What do I read into this? 
Two-fold: Where it's near 53 degrees, they're probably oversubscribed or 
lack terminal supply, or both. Where it's well away from 53 degrees, I'd 
guess they probably just lack satellite capacity full stop.

Ukraine is waitlisted...? But wait - didn't Starlink just take over the 
Internet there? Interesting also that one of the waitlist / no service 
areas in Germany is right where they had the floods & where Starlink got 
deployed very publicly with (I understand) some success. Did the locals 
hang on to the emergency dishys and does this now saturate the network 
there? And what did the Greeks do to be all waitlisted?

So what happens if you roam from a place with availability into a place 
with "waitlist" status? Anyone with a dishy up for a road trip with a 
story to tell?

$25/month sounds steep but is probably modest in comparison to the 
roaming charges that some cellular providers charge.

On 5/05/2022 7:00 pm, David Lang wrote:
> received this Wednesday evening.
> Makes sense,
>
> David Lang
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Portability Now Available
>
> Starlink is excited to announce Portability as an add-on feature for 
> all Starlink customers. Portability enables customers to temporarily 
> move their Starlink to new locations and receive high-speed internet 
> anywhere where Starlink provides active coverage within the same 
> continent. To see active coverage areas, please view the Starlink 
> Availability Map ( http://www.starlink.com/map 
> <http://www.starlink.com/map> 
> ).
>
> You can enable Portability for $25/month on your account page ( 
> https://starlink.com/account 
> <https://starlink.com/account> 
> ). Once enabled, Portability will take effect immediately, and you can 
> disable Portability from your account page at any time.
>
> To learn more about Starlink Portability, please read our FAQ page ( 
> http://www.starlink.com/faq 
> <http://www.starlink.com/faq> 
> ).
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink 
> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>

-- 
****************************************************************
Dr. Ulrich Speidel

School of Computer Science

Room 303S.594 (City Campus)

The University of Auckland
u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz  
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/
****************************************************************



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4702 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-05  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-05  7:00 David Lang
2022-05-05  7:40 ` Ulrich Speidel [this message]
2022-05-05  9:21   ` David Lang
2022-05-05 23:46     ` Larry Press
2022-05-06  2:41       ` Mike Puchol
2022-05-06  3:11         ` Dave Taht
2022-05-06  9:17           ` Mike Puchol
2022-05-06  3:04       ` Bruce Perens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=77f03647-c1af-00c3-21b6-19fc62a81e44@auckland.ac.nz \
    --to=u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox