Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal

[Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1274 bytes --]


> On Feb 23, 2024, at 3:23 AM, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit :
>> https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734
>> In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and good
>> range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the starlink
>> frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield. For that
>> matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be it wifi, or
>> 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead.
> 
> But laser could be blinded by counter-lasers, fiber could be cut by scissors, etc.
> 
> Measures, counter-measures, counter-counter-measures and so on, equally well on each of these media.
> 
> Alex

The point is some media can be remotely detected and targeted.

Laser is harder to detect than wireless (radio).
Fiber is even harder to be detected remotely.

Gene


> 
>> See also the flipper zero.
>> https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink


[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]