From: Ulrich Speidel <ulrich@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink for Tonga?
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:44:55 +1300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d34164a-3ad7-ba9f-cd59-b550f4cf570b@cs.auckland.ac.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <097bbcb6-987d-0461-fb2a-2c7c4a8c0c97@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5890 bytes --]
https://matangitonga.to/2022/02/08/tonga-cable-broken
On 8/02/2022 9:38 am, Ulrich Speidel wrote:
>
> I've been watching (and commenting on) this ever since one of our MPs
> tweeted Elon Musk with a plea for help for Tonga (and as the PhD
> supervisor of Tonga's first PhD student in Computer Science and
> someone who has had Pacific connectivity at the core of his work, I've
> got a fairly good understanding of what "Tonga offline" means in
> practice). That said...
>
> - Practical range from gateway ground station to user ground station
> is more like 300-400 km. Fiji-Tongatapu is twice that distance.
> - Countless images of gateways (and fencing around it) suggest that
> satellite elevation from gateways needs to be a bit more than 25deg.
> - Satellite density in the tropics is lowest for Starlink's currently
> operational 53 degree inclination network.
> - It's my understanding that dishys don't actually track using their
> motors, which they use only to position themselves initially in the
> direction of the highest satellite density (=wherever your closest
> 53rd parallel is, basically). That's a strategy that doesn't really
> work in the tropics because you can't see the sky above the 53rd
> parallel. So here, your dishys would need to know to point
> west-north-west.
>
> While it's encouraging to see Starlink send folk to Fiji to scout
> things out (there are plenty of Fijian outlying islands where Starlink
> service would be welcome, too, at least by the locals, not necessarily
> by the regulators), I don't hold my breath on them making serious
> inroads when it comes to alleviating the current connectivity crisis.
>
> The cable ship (CS SubCom Reliance) tasked with repair of the cable is
> on site and, judging by its AIS track, has located the end of the
> cable coming from Tongatapu. It appears to have shifted a significant
> distance south (around 1-2 km), possibly as a result of a turbidite
> flow (underwater landslide) from a seamount in the area that was
> triggered by the eruption at Hunga further north (my going theory
> anyway - there's a seamount right where it needs to be for that sort
> of damage and there's no other event that explains the timing of the
> cable outage). Either way, if the area is suitable for re-laying the
> cable, Tonga should be back online within the next week. Otherwise add
> a week or two.
>
> On 8/02/2022 8:06 am, Nathan Owens wrote:
>> You can simulate it on starlink.sx
>> <http://starlink.sx>,
>> maybe Mike will chime in with what he found in doing that.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 11:05 AM Christian von der Ropp <cvdr@vdr.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> But in practice the satellites won't be sitting and waiting at
>> the edge of this 940km radius. They are moving in and out the
>> radius and the question is if satellite density is high enough so
>> that once the serving satellite loses its gateway link there's
>> another satellite in the 940km radius which also covers Tonga.
>> And then this new satellite cannot be within certain elevation
>> angles (~60-80° at 0° azimuth) where the geostationary arc
>> crosses Fijian skies and the gateway antennas have to seize
>> emission. My gut feeling is that availability in Tonga would be
>> <90% simply because it's too far out at the edge of a Fijian
>> gateway's range where there will be frequent service interruptions.
>>
>>
>> Am 07.02.2022 um 19:51 schrieb Nathan Owens:
>>> The current coverage radius of a gateway/ground station with a
>>> 25 degree minimum elevation is ~940km, so nothing in theory.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 10:50 AM Daniel AJ Sokolov
>>> <daniel@sokolov.eu.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I hope this is not offtopic: Starlink wants to build a
>>> ground station on
>>> Fiji to supply Tonga with internet.
>>>
>>> The distance between Tonga and Fiji is about 750 km minimum.
>>> That's
>>> quite the distance.
>>>
>>> What does Starlink have to do to make this work?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Daniel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlink mailing list
>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlink mailing list
>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>> <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>
> --
> ****************************************************************
> Dr. Ulrich Speidel
>
> School of Computer Science
>
> Room 303S.594 (City Campus)
> Ph: (+64-9)-373-7599 ext. 85282
>
> The University of Auckland
> ulrich@cs.auckland.ac.nz
> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/
> ****************************************************************
>
>
>
--
****************************************************************
Dr. Ulrich Speidel
School of Computer Science
Room 303S.594 (City Campus)
Ph: (+64-9)-373-7599 ext. 85282
The University of Auckland
ulrich@cs.auckland.ac.nz
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/
****************************************************************
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 9966 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-07 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-07 18:50 Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-02-07 18:51 ` Nathan Owens
2022-02-07 19:05 ` Christian von der Ropp
2022-02-07 19:06 ` Nathan Owens
2022-02-07 20:38 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-07 20:44 ` Ulrich Speidel [this message]
2022-02-10 7:53 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-07 21:18 ` Ben Greear
2022-02-07 21:24 ` David Lang
2022-02-07 21:36 ` Mike Puchol
2022-02-07 22:22 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-07 22:29 ` Mike Puchol
2022-02-07 23:36 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-07 23:47 ` David Lang
2022-02-08 0:20 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-08 1:20 ` David Lang
2022-02-08 4:46 ` Inemesit Affia
2022-02-08 6:25 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-02-08 7:30 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-08 7:49 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-02-08 8:22 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-08 8:47 ` Mike Puchol
2022-02-08 8:49 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-02-08 8:58 ` Mike Puchol
2022-02-08 9:05 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-02-08 9:10 ` Mike Puchol
2022-02-08 15:22 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-02-08 10:11 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-08 13:50 ` Christian von der Ropp
2022-02-08 15:28 ` Mike Puchol
2022-02-08 16:25 ` Dave Taht
2022-02-08 18:20 ` Gary E. Miller
2022-02-08 19:12 ` David Lang
2022-02-09 12:09 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-09 19:28 ` [Starlink] Sunburp kills 40 starlink satellites Doc Searls
2022-02-09 19:51 ` Michael Richardson
2022-02-09 12:58 ` [Starlink] Starlink for Tonga? Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-18 5:04 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-02-18 7:27 ` Mike Puchol
2022-02-18 9:01 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-04-19 11:57 ` Mike Puchol
2022-04-19 12:06 ` Dave Taht
2022-04-19 12:43 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-04-20 1:06 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-04-20 1:14 ` Jeremy Austin
2022-02-18 10:27 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-02-18 12:48 ` Rich Brown
2022-02-18 15:43 ` Nathan Owens
2022-02-18 10:29 ` Ulrich Speidel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d34164a-3ad7-ba9f-cd59-b550f4cf570b@cs.auckland.ac.nz \
--to=ulrich@cs.auckland.ac.nz \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox