From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nextlayer.at (smtp2.nextlayer.at [IPv6:2a01:190:1764:150::37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A504C3CB37 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:36:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.31.253.102] (guestkeeper.heise.de [193.99.145.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nextlayer.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D417800095 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:35:59 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.nextlayer.at 7D417800095 Message-ID: <7d3c5d28-fd21-5bf1-361a-67f0b54d625f@falco.ca> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:35:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Content-Language: en-GB To: Starlink References: <1661878433.14064713@apps.rackspace.com> <7b7bff13-b0ef-41ad-9a40-d12bfe5a0dfe@Spark> From: Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: <7b7bff13-b0ef-41ad-9a40-d12bfe5a0dfe@Spark> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "beam spread" X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 20:36:01 -0000 On 2022-08-30 at 13:09, Mike Puchol via Starlink wrote: > People who have a disposable income of $1 to $5 per month just cannot > be serviced by a financially viable service that relies on fiber. > Here, you need to start getting creative. Indeed, but they can't afford Starlink either. Daniel