From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] [Bloat] "New analysis of Cloudflare Aggregated Internet Measurement (AIM) data from NetForecast, leveraging open Measurement Lab backend"
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 14:22:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80A2E78D-1E4B-4CCA-9759-9E2273257DD1@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJUtOOjw93CcTQiDDz2iQ90zu48=TkYVLQ9L9=aq_2k-1Y9b_g@mail.gmail.com>
Figure 17 illustrates starlinks latency reduction effort pretty well.
I guess folks on this list already know, but still this implies that there might have been two stages in latency reduction so far (or I might be massively overinterpret the plotted curve ;) )
Regards & Thanks Jason & Frantisek
Sebastian
> On 24. May 2024, at 13:41, Frantisek Borsik via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> https://www.netforecast.com/wp-content/uploads/NFR5150_NetForecast-ISP-Performance-Report-2024.pdf
>
> Originally shared by Jason Livingood on Twitter/X:
> https://x.com/jlivingood/status/1793664523557286216
> His thread contains some additional reading.
>
> All the best,
>
> FrankFrantisek (Frank) Borsik
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
> Skype: casioa5302ca
> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-24 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <CAJUtOOjw93CcTQiDDz2iQ90zu48=TkYVLQ9L9=aq_2k-1Y9b_g@mail.gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80A2E78D-1E4B-4CCA-9759-9E2273257DD1@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox