From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>, 5grm-satellite@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Alphabet spins off Starlink competitor Taara
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:22:02 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <822574.1742275322@dyas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1oqn4685-8qsp-923n-9p4s-487rn4p65o77@ynat.uz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]
David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> Since it kept talking about being a replacement for Starlink, I assumed
> that the towers would communicate with satellites. If there are no
> satellites being used, then it's not going to be a Starlink competitor
> as you would have to build a long chain of laser towers to try and
> provide service everywhere.
(It would work fine for the flat earth types though)
(or if you live on Terry Pratchard's Discword)
But, seriously we have lots and lots of microwave towers from decades ago.
I think most are abandonned due to fibre being better, but getting new rights
of way for fiber is probably hard. The railways were delighted to be
involved 30 years ago, but now, I suspect the field is closed to any new
entrants.
So lasers between towers makes a lot of sense to me.
Particularly through/across marshy tundra in, for instance, Canada's north.
Just not between pacific islands.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [
] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 658 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 5:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 19:36 Hesham ElBakoury
2025-03-17 22:50 ` David Lang
2025-03-17 23:02 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2025-03-17 23:10 ` David Lang
2025-03-17 23:25 ` J Pan
2025-03-18 0:47 ` David Lang
2025-03-17 23:35 ` Marc Blanchet
2025-03-18 0:49 ` David Lang
2025-03-18 5:22 ` Michael Richardson [this message]
2025-03-18 6:43 ` Mike Puchol
2025-03-18 7:56 ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-03-18 16:02 ` Steve Stroh
2025-03-18 17:44 ` Craig Polk
2025-03-18 6:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-03-17 23:45 ` Eric Kuhnke
2025-03-17 23:54 ` Brandon Butterworth
2025-03-18 0:04 ` Eric Kuhnke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=822574.1742275322@dyas \
--to=mcr@sandelman.ca \
--cc=5grm-satellite@ieee.org \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox