Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx>
To: Larry Press <lpress@csudh.edu>, David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 13:15:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <841ca6dc-d6d3-46ab-87c0-d6bcaa31533b@Spark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <92n4s129-6r15-7q75-7293-qpo73q298srn@ynat.uz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4553 bytes --]

On the multiple terminals, I have verified that the duty cycle of a consumer terminal is 14%, thus, you could have 7 terminals on a single uplink channel with some guard time. I have seen 30 Mbps up, so you’d be able to push 210 Mbps in uplink, or a spectral efficiency of about 3.4 bps/Hz.

From the satellite side, maybe EPFD limits don’t apply over water bodies, and they can place multiple co-frequency beams onto a single cell, which would allow throughputs into multiple gigabits per second (if no other usage around of course).

I’m working on simulating ship scenarios on my tracker, along with other features.

Best,

Mike
On Jul 14, 2022, 09:00 +0200, David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>, wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2022, Larry Press wrote:
>
> > <$50k/month (for all their boats)
> >
> > Do they have ten ships?
>
> I know of 7 off the top of my head, the three drone ships, the multi-purpose
> recovery ships bob and doug, they got a couple more recently(named for females,
> don't remember the names reliably), all those recovery ships on the east coast,
> so they probably have one or two on the west coast, and I don't think that
> includes the dragon recovery craft.
>
> > > $150k/month with much better service
> >
> > Is that for uncapped service from a GEO? What speeds do they get for that? Do GEO folks like Hughes offer SLAs to business customers?
>
> that was for 25G of bandwidth from the post I saw mentioned, they didn't mention
> the speed (but they did show the difference in video quality from the barges
> between the old and new)
>
> David Lang
>
> > Does SES offer marine connectivity?
> >
> > Russian oligarchs will be early customers.
> >
> > Larry Press
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Starlink <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2022 5:40 PM
> > To: Gary E. Miller <gem@rellim.com>
> > Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea
> >
> > it all depends on what you are comparing it to. This isn't designed for a 30 ft
> > boat, but rather for commercial operations. SpaceX had talked about how this
> > replaces the earlier satellite services they have had on their boats that were
> > unreliable and cost >$150k/month with much better service listing for
> > <$50k/month (for all their boats)
> >
> > This is designed to be an all-weather allways-on service, most boaters could
> > just use a standard starlink RV setup and put it out when they need it (taking
> > it down when the weather is poor)
> >
> > David Lang
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Gary E. Miller via Starlink wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:36:02 -0700
> > > From: Gary E. Miller via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > > Reply-To: Gary E. Miller <gem@rellim.com>
> > > To: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > > Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea
> > >
> > > Yo Dave!
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:20:43 -0700
> > > Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.royalcaribbeanblog.com/2022/06/28/i-tried-elon-musks-starlink-internet-royal-caribbean-cruise-ship__;!!P7nkOOY!rxlTbVxEkw-MFoqu8DRa85IzMzIO1zBngo2MWxU3hZC2uf--DSi39Jg1_QDzFZyl3ShxZFNhM0oEQFMaJMhpU32Mkw$
> > >
> > >
> > > Did you notice the eye popping cost?
> > >
> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.starlink.com/maritime__;!!P7nkOOY!rxlTbVxEkw-MFoqu8DRa85IzMzIO1zBngo2MWxU3hZC2uf--DSi39Jg1_QDzFZyl3ShxZFNhM0oEQFMaJMgLmSbzsw$
> > >
> > > "High-speed, low-latency internet with up to 350 Mbps download while at
> > > sea. $5,000/mo with a one-time hardware cost of $10,000 for two high
> > > performance terminals."
> > >
> > > I know a bunch of yacthies that have been waiting for this, but are
> > > now
> > > disappointed.
> > >
> > > RGDS
> > > GARY
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
> > > gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
> > >
> > > Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
> > > "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 5467 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-14  0:20 Dave Taht
2022-07-14  0:31 ` David Lang
2022-07-14  0:36 ` Gary E. Miller
2022-07-14  0:40   ` David Lang
2022-07-14  0:59     ` Gary E. Miller
2022-07-14  1:36       ` David Lang
2022-07-14  5:46     ` Larry Press
2022-07-14  7:00       ` David Lang
2022-07-14 11:15         ` Mike Puchol [this message]
2022-07-14 11:32           ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-07-14 12:02             ` Mike Puchol
2022-07-14 12:34               ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-07-14 12:49                 ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-07-14 12:57                   ` Jared Mauch
2022-07-14 13:05                     ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-07-14 13:33                       ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-07-14 14:56                         ` Mike Puchol
2022-07-14 15:28                           ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-07-14 15:32                             ` Nathan Owens
2022-07-27 21:17           ` Dave Taht
2024-07-02 20:40 Dave Taht
2024-07-03  3:40 ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-07-03 17:21   ` Larry Press
2024-07-03  4:21 ` Marc Blanchet
2024-07-03  4:26   ` J Pan
2024-07-03 17:06   ` Larry Press
2024-07-03 22:06   ` Michael Richardson
2024-07-14 19:32     ` J Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=841ca6dc-d6d3-46ab-87c0-d6bcaa31533b@Spark \
    --to=mike@starlink.sx \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=lpress@csudh.edu \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox