From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from vsmx001.dclux.xion.oxcs.net (vsmx001.dclux.xion.oxcs.net [185.74.65.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CD193B29D for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 02:27:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from proxy-2.proxy.oxio.ns.xion.oxcs.net (proxy-2.proxy.oxio.ns.xion.oxcs.net [83.61.18.4]) by mx-out.dclux.xion.oxcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 790338C0304; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:27:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dclux.xion.oxcs.net; s=mail1; t=1645169266; bh=4/VNMFiDUHDcd1wMEh5j+vqsB+PxO3fWwvVzFUBbhvw=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=I04CLvbdErIB91/nCGSf0OtIOu31tuMoGDiLoXg5nJfjaethZP3fSTvuUEwpRA4E6 7EUnnH7B310PUsbEWVeWsPad/vW2M1gYtLo8XN710EkY9zzz2s3dIM0D/cSz+InIE2 NMJP03I3rUhz1OKg94qzLl9tdZJFYGKaTaPBkIZ0jCv4YCRO/wBNc592l/xaOnZcxq aPtrwSUgwVDv5WLsKKvY1/z5nJHygZSa2QW0UBbPaO7GXJ2W1KAjntDxk49WSUZzSn MfT9Du1mYRznoB4fKN06NyDqpNuidFPHW9oJcPxhhjOtfG7l6f5V3mxRd/GUQt49yR riaJifgC4fZHw== Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 08:27:37 +0100 From: Mike Puchol To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net, Daniel AJ Sokolov Message-ID: <866041e1-efaf-43f1-b218-6a6d73f6496f@Spark> In-Reply-To: <16b22115-3ec4-cdec-2cb3-ab03d75d9275@falco.ca> References: <0d78acc3-1101-c7d2-c7a6-53158b8c1045@vdr.net> <44b2b090-457b-eb59-a75a-a0bbb0307073@candelatech.com> <431oq9ns-qnpn-n56r-6np6-374rsq317q@ynat.uz> <8ecdc077-1751-4302-a013-fa35b2291a87@Spark> <380541e2-c5fa-b3ff-b28c-8d3d993be416@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <5d9dab2c-3c20-4d18-aa1d-cc72bf250843@Spark> <16b22115-3ec4-cdec-2cb3-ab03d75d9275@falco.ca> X-Readdle-Message-ID: 866041e1-efaf-43f1-b218-6a6d73f6496f@Spark MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="620f4a6e_46e87ccd_1b27" X-VadeSecure-Status: LEGIT X-VADE-STATUS: LEGIT Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink for Tonga? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:27:47 -0000 --620f4a6e_46e87ccd_1b27 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Daniel, I added it after there was a confirmation on Twitter that SpaceX people w= ere on the ground to set one up, and also, as two /27 blocks (IPv4) have = been assigned to =46iji=E2=80=99s capital, under the Sydney POP, and they= can be pinged. Wether it=E2=80=99s at the teleport or not, unsure, but for simulation, a= n error of even a few km doesn=E2=80=99t really matter. Best, Mike On =46eb 18, 2022, 06:04 +0100, Daniel AJ Sokolov , wr= ote: > On 2022-02-07 at 15:29, Mike Puchol wrote: > > As far as placing a gateway in =46iji, it already has a teleport > > facility, which will have power and fibre (unless that one has been > > taken out too=3F). Checkhttps://goo.gl/maps/6BYXf4R17yys7zNe9 > > Hey Mike, you put a =22SUVA (Emergency)=22 ground station on starlink.s= x. > > Is that for simulation, or has Starlink actually installed a ground > station in =46idschi by now=3F Would you have positive confirmation=3F > > Thank you > Daniel > =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F > Starlink mailing list > Starlink=40lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --620f4a6e_46e87ccd_1b27 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Daniel,

I added it after there was a confirmation on Twitter that SpaceX people w= ere on the ground to set one up, and also, as two /27 blocks (IPv4) have = been assigned to =46iji=E2=80=99s capital, under the Sydney POP, and they= can be pinged.

Wether it=E2=80=99s at the teleport or not, unsure, but for simulation, a= n error of even a few km doesn=E2=80=99t really matter.

Best,

Mike
On =46eb 18, 2022, 06:04 +0100, Dan= iel AJ Sokolov <daniel=40falco.ca>, wrote:
On 2022-02-07 at 15:29, Mike Puchol wrote:
As far as placing a gateway in =46iji, it a= lready has a teleport
facility, which will have power and fibre (unless that one has been
= taken out too=3F). Checkhttps://goo.gl/maps/6BYXf4R17yys7zNe9

Hey Mike, you put a =22SUVA (Emergency)=22 ground station on starlink.sx.=

Is that for simulation, or has Starlink actually installed a ground
= station in =46idschi by now=3F Would you have positive confirmation=3F
Thank you
Daniel
=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F
Starlink mailing list
Starlink=40lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--620f4a6e_46e87ccd_1b27--