Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN

[Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>]

We did test this. IPv6 over LISP. Which means IPv6 EIDs used at transport layer over IPv4 encapsulation. But we did not run  over IPv6 locators.

So what I mean is we tested:

(1) IPv4 overlay on an IPv4 satellite underlay 
(2) IPv6 overlay on an IPv4 satellite underlay 

Dino

> On Jan 22, 2025, at 2:53 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> How about openvpn over ipv6?
> 
> Or with a static ip assigned to the starlink?
> 
> Wireguard works for me....
> 
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 3:02 PM Dino Farinacci via Starlink
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>> 
>> I haven't tried openvpn but I have done a bunch of testing of LISP over Starlink. If anyone wants details I can point you to an Internet Draft and slides that have been presented a couple of times at IETF.
>> 
>> Dino
>> 
>>> On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:25 PM, David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if they got the connectors to completely bypass the router)?
>>> 
>>> I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems trying to get openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to the router on the starlink side)
>>> 
>>> the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when trying UDP, when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starlink side (st least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to work
>>> 
>>> David Lang
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlink mailing list
>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos