From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8EE3B29E for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:25:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f4409fc8fdso535081a91.1 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:25:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1737588329; x=1738193129; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=AXlu1T7GU/wuOLxg42LMLRbLTQDaY3vyEW+BX/LtU+E=; b=QPOyjcHdStXX9DmlRJPSIGHdD6eI6LZl9kwtSsPKoTMCBzx9CxYCBuFdR/VaaK42Tu Vs+1FjColTsoQvZqIgNa3Ru4IbNQaRrgEj1u4q3Yr2IC4+bNuqtn95GOdIWU9CsM006C MU1mxaxz3ccHTNPDd09xtzpufWY3wNBsG3n6qW40wRtN+7rsjdpfwSI1M0cb8Y4AzMQv lz1doS5ikhQQFuSFjAVpaARMuw8wk18ZFnz8V01wBKpiS01pkgoSYR5sFdLicskcd63d sBC7PlEYP8rjXkI9a8wntFqogNl3/elJebTjtd5x7d8jmQoyAF7PKp1+PfD+K4QWuk9V gNyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737588329; x=1738193129; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AXlu1T7GU/wuOLxg42LMLRbLTQDaY3vyEW+BX/LtU+E=; b=SnGhaIdwiEKaJytN+RS2AqAePm5W8ebkvZMgymvECgCNMhx//3UE0yo1Q2yGiitwDa bWIWFjjDCBtNmiMNZw4cII9tDpJP+inF1IU0FzmzjcGjO/yX4Ld04BulsrVpsQuLp/uc FzxA/bo4v/ytBj2+nGPRskRVPNK/MhtMeiLyeL+c+KDlQc5AzU+rb4Skp3ls4XQ40K4f Z4dJHHHZ+A8krTxhM4UrPxvVu7Wke+lL2JgUSdvOucGNHdsWTFsgJgC0SNsxbv/PWEob eLV/CXKWLIs5y8eCdWXeP9a1053upQxEAqMXKdPW0dlYazgPw9Fqv86ZMM+MwPmolosI faaQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVtxmEwApsccOSdaHNeV9PTZmHkBzD+iUfEX65IGxT0eHOPFL7Zoegk9xUyhtWPE6o45+WdJgAaYQ==@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx67QNyI9/ZdOTxCZ0Np+Rn0/dla2D0uLw4NMyj4/lnvKmlrabc e0qhbfNZn+Fg/yLzYL+q86TWHCsb+/0AqnIAl/ToCOhk9b+g6c8B X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsfiegQNuAXpmpmsIV11HyguypASyprFCIYbIG7OVNLJXFYsyj34DijS6LK+wu TJrYNRIhq7yNskamzFGTkIYiTCXosMTZgbMucQLsdR2nkEuz7LcXoUKosmX87IKuBeRWkQpInyi ahNzqodA1NT5m02kGVxBcMmJZs8T12KL2Jg/f4Mb0QiPXVer1t5jMuu6d6Q6zTnVRNIVVAUI/yu Yo0lPHuHHNpsAJUPt90Hgrk5jWxFSwkrWlBFOwne7mGmwYCbGGA/sgpJyZbIWVvvwpV5IYzlVgM o01GBIze912qNHA85CB9z+JJSKM+bXtBAyhlADFWJ9WwKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHkN3OusvCC9iKe4bGNLQ3BckC5T4xHwLsyv3sHLQIB831A+cGxWJgO74LFiwI7b3gSKSqxug== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fc43:b0:2f5:63a:44f8 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f7f1781189mr1779284a91.8.1737588329383; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:25:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-24-5-184-219.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.184.219]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 41be03b00d2f7-a9bcc3232c0sm11243915a12.28.2025.01.22.15.25.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:25:29 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\)) From: Dino Farinacci In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 15:25:17 -0800 Cc: David Lang , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <876F3240-9935-441F-96E8-1DAD972D9606@gmail.com> References: <269839o2-003o-1756-8r28-3on7q7nsrn54@ynat.uz> To: Dave Taht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.200.121) Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 23:25:30 -0000 We did test this. IPv6 over LISP. Which means IPv6 EIDs used at = transport layer over IPv4 encapsulation. But we did not run over IPv6 = locators. So what I mean is we tested: (1) IPv4 overlay on an IPv4 satellite underlay=20 (2) IPv6 overlay on an IPv4 satellite underlay=20 Dino > On Jan 22, 2025, at 2:53=E2=80=AFPM, Dave Taht = wrote: >=20 > How about openvpn over ipv6? >=20 > Or with a static ip assigned to the starlink? >=20 > Wireguard works for me.... >=20 > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 3:02=E2=80=AFPM Dino Farinacci via Starlink > wrote: >>=20 >> I haven't tried openvpn but I have done a bunch of testing of LISP = over Starlink. If anyone wants details I can point you to an Internet = Draft and slides that have been presented a couple of times at IETF. >>=20 >> Dino >>=20 >>> On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:25=E2=80=AFPM, David Lang via Starlink = wrote: >>>=20 >>> has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if = they got the connectors to completely bypass the router)? >>>=20 >>> I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems = trying to get openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the = cgnat to the router on the starlink side) >>>=20 >>> the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when = trying UDP, when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from = the starlink side (st least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the = other way to work >>>=20 >>> David Lang >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlink mailing list >>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Dave T=C3=A4ht CSO, LibreQos