Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Kutkov <contact@olegkutkov.me>
To: Jonathan Bennett <jonathanbennett@hackaday.com>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] First tests of the Starlink REV4 (aka gen3)
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 01:50:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <895f12d4-9941-484d-aca1-05f988a4be59@olegkutkov.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHtUBujyeSi_zENtk=XvdfqdP-Ty_H5Sxa4t4BPuhZ8LxJFdMA@mail.gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2414 bytes --]

The PoE "standard" is the same.

Thus, you can power the new terminal with any Starlink PoE injector 
(even REV1).

On 1/25/24 01:40, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
> I'm mainly curious if the move back to RJ45 means they are now using a 
> real POE standard, instead of the custom solution the previous 
> generations have used.
>
> Jonathan Bennett
> Hackaday.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:47 PM Oleg Kutkov via Starlink 
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
>     I will try to do better tests this weekend, measuring all the
>     necessary
>     parameters. Plus IPv6
>
>     On 1/24/24 14:37, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
>     > Thanks for the tests!
>     >
>     > The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.
>     >
>     > At video pointer 5:53 the reported Ping ?/dl/ul 88/204/121 ms and
>     > Jitter 9.2 ms seem interesting.
>     >
>     >     ==> I am not sure which of the two (ping or jitter) you name
>     > 'latency'?
>     >
>     >     ==> I am not sure why the dl (download) ping ms is higher
>     than the
>     > ul.
>     >
>     >     ==> I don't know what is the first ('?') parameter reported as
>     > 88ms for Ping?
>     >
>     > I wonder whether the DHCPv6-PD is still supported by REV4 and
>     whether
>     > the allocated prefix is still a non-/64 (i.e. a /56 delivered by
>     > DHCPv6-PD reported earlier on this email list by Steven on Dec. 12,
>     > 2023)?
>     >
>     > Alex
>     >
>     > Le 23/01/2024 à 10:07, Oleg Kutkov via Starlink a écrit :
>     >> I conducted the initial comparative tests of the new terminal in
>     >> Ukraine. I guess it's not a really "legal" because the new
>     terminal
>     >> is not certified and not selling outside the US for the moment.
>     But
>     >> who cares.
>     >>
>     >> Here's a video: https://youtu.be/hWPMpJrjd1g
>     >>
>     >> I will try to do more technical tests next week. There will be
>     a new
>     >> video.
>     >>
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > Starlink mailing list
>     > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>     > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>     -- 
>     Best regards,
>     Oleg Kutkov
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Starlink mailing list
>     Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>     https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
-- 
Best regards,
Oleg Kutkov

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5194 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: rev4_poe.jpg --]
[-- Type: image/jpeg, Size: 135882 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-24 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-23  9:07 Oleg Kutkov
2024-01-24 12:37 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-01-24 22:47   ` Oleg Kutkov
2024-01-24 23:40     ` Jonathan Bennett
2024-01-24 23:50       ` Oleg Kutkov [this message]
2024-01-25  1:29         ` David Lang
2024-01-25  1:54   ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-02-22 12:18     ` Alexandre Petrescu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=895f12d4-9941-484d-aca1-05f988a4be59@olegkutkov.me \
    --to=contact@olegkutkov.me \
    --cc=jonathanbennett@hackaday.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox