The PoE "standard" is the same.

Thus, you can power the new terminal with any Starlink PoE injector (even REV1).

On 1/25/24 01:40, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
I'm mainly curious if the move back to RJ45 means they are now using a real POE standard, instead of the custom solution the previous generations have used.

Jonathan Bennett
Hackaday.com


On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:47 PM Oleg Kutkov via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
I will try to do better tests this weekend, measuring all the necessary
parameters. Plus IPv6

On 1/24/24 14:37, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
> Thanks for the tests!
>
> The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.
>
> At video pointer 5:53 the reported Ping ?/dl/ul 88/204/121 ms and
> Jitter 9.2 ms seem interesting.
>
>     ==> I am not sure which of the two (ping or jitter) you name
> 'latency'?
>
>     ==> I am not sure why the dl (download) ping ms is higher than the
> ul.
>
>     ==> I don't know what is the first ('?') parameter reported as
> 88ms for Ping?
>
> I wonder whether the DHCPv6-PD is still supported by REV4 and whether
> the allocated prefix is still a non-/64 (i.e. a /56 delivered by
> DHCPv6-PD reported earlier on this email list by Steven on Dec. 12,
> 2023)?
>
> Alex
>
> Le 23/01/2024 à 10:07, Oleg Kutkov via Starlink a écrit :
>> I conducted the initial comparative tests of the new terminal in
>> Ukraine. I guess it's not a really "legal" because the new terminal
>> is not certified and not selling outside the US for the moment. But
>> who cares.
>>
>> Here's a video: https://youtu.be/hWPMpJrjd1g
>>
>> I will try to do more technical tests next week. There will be a new
>> video.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

--
Best regards,
Oleg Kutkov

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
-- 
Best regards,
Oleg Kutkov