The PoE "standard" is the same.
Thus, you can power the new terminal with any Starlink PoE injector (even REV1).
I'm mainly curious if the move back to RJ45 means they are now using a real POE standard, instead of the custom solution the previous generations have used.
Jonathan BennettHackaday.com
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 4:47 PM Oleg Kutkov via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
I will try to do better tests this weekend, measuring all the necessary
parameters. Plus IPv6
On 1/24/24 14:37, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
> Thanks for the tests!
>
> The dl/ul speeds 300/15 mbit/s are impressive.
>
> At video pointer 5:53 the reported Ping ?/dl/ul 88/204/121 ms and
> Jitter 9.2 ms seem interesting.
>
> ==> I am not sure which of the two (ping or jitter) you name
> 'latency'?
>
> ==> I am not sure why the dl (download) ping ms is higher than the
> ul.
>
> ==> I don't know what is the first ('?') parameter reported as
> 88ms for Ping?
>
> I wonder whether the DHCPv6-PD is still supported by REV4 and whether
> the allocated prefix is still a non-/64 (i.e. a /56 delivered by
> DHCPv6-PD reported earlier on this email list by Steven on Dec. 12,
> 2023)?
>
> Alex
>
> Le 23/01/2024 à 10:07, Oleg Kutkov via Starlink a écrit :
>> I conducted the initial comparative tests of the new terminal in
>> Ukraine. I guess it's not a really "legal" because the new terminal
>> is not certified and not selling outside the US for the moment. But
>> who cares.
>>
>> Here's a video: https://youtu.be/hWPMpJrjd1g
>>
>> I will try to do more technical tests next week. There will be a new
>> video.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--
Best regards,
Oleg Kutkov
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
-- Best regards, Oleg Kutkov