From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2d4:f00f:f00f:b33b:b33b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6A8F3CB35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:33:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2601:642:4204:910:2d57:4815:5724:733c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A08EF22A10; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) From: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:33:27 -0700 Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8ACA7F25-1FB2-4724-B1F6-3969285516FF@teklibre.net> References: To: Jared Mauch X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) Subject: Re: [Starlink] dslreports speedtest X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:33:31 -0000 > On Jun 28, 2021, at 3:38 PM, Jared Mauch = wrote: >=20 > my result if someone wants to look at it: >=20 > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/68794590 This is using the starlink supplied wifi router? If that=E2=80=99s the case=E2=80=A6 *All* of your bufferbloat moved to the wifi, which under my tests peaked = at over 7sec. the 2sec of latency you just experienced on that test = breaks every protocol the internet has=E2=80=A6 several times over. I am not sure if the needed AQL + fq_codel patches are working on the = IPQ8014 in openwrt-rc3 right now. (most of our work shifted until = recently into the mt76 based chipsets) [1] But after we get your cerowrt (ath9k) router back up again, a test at = this range ought to be a very interesting real-world comparison. [2] = Again, though, we=E2=80=99re testing -rc3 and might well have broke = something else somewhere! [1] https://forum.openwrt.org/t/aql-and-the-ath10k-is-lovely/59002 [2] 90Mbit results for fq_codel for wifi here: http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/real_results/ > I'm about 40-50' away from the router which is outside with the > solar panels and other gear. I'm inside and dishy is on the roof > partially obstructed but somewhat better after some light application = of > the chainsaw. >=20 > - jared >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 06:35:25PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: >>=20 >> I went to go check my bufferbloat and it says: >>=20 >> This connection is not satellite >> latency of 45ms is too low >> Test cancelled >>=20 >> Kinda amusing. >>=20 >> - Jared >>=20 >> (e-mail sent over ssh via starlink) >>=20 >> --=20 >> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from = jared@puck.nether.net >> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only = mine. >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >=20 > --=20 > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only = mine. > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink