Re: [Starlink] impressed with my starlink today

["Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1882 bytes --]

IMO I don’t think you can judge that by using Galene – you need to use the large market-share platforms. Also, given the density issues facing LEO services, a single sample can’t be taken as particularly representative – you’d need more users across a broader range of density/terrain types.

JL

From: Starlink <starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply-To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Friday, September 15, 2023 at 18:45
To: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Starlink] impressed with my starlink today

I just did a bunch of videoconferences all morning without many glitches. (2 hours, only one download glitch, not recording so I do not know how good the up was) Admittedly, I was
using galene.org<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/galene.org__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!AwJw0pjxf076FkQM4rXF8f3rISzxQCURREhzLa7IZFgxvmgtQP16gVm8yjle-XsLqPa92ijxNko7aWsEdoQbf9jW__cpI23ESQ$> rather than zoom, but I did do a couple up and downloads while talking and they seemed to work pretty well.

I ran a few tests afterwards, to observe my overall bandwidth up was way up, and tcp congestion controls pretty smoothly adapting to physical changes in RTT and bandwidth for a change. I sat there and admired the T+120 smoothnesss in this transition, in particular.

Anyone else seeing progress in long term behaviors? I think in part it was just galene doing better, or perhaps it was because my baseline bandwidth stayed above galene´s base.


--
Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!AwJw0pjxf076FkQM4rXF8f3rISzxQCURREhzLa7IZFgxvmgtQP16gVm8yjle-XsLqPa92ijxNko7aWsEdoQbf9jW__eDsNR67A$>
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4667 bytes --]