From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink lost over 200 satellites in two months – tracker data
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 12:15:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <94994411-fb55-402c-9606-d2d6c4b3e6d4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4ptNWRKBnGfht9X4YutUmU3uGE9HTPTrHRdoFS4=7nsw@mail.gmail.com>
One can see the starlink 're-entries' on some re-entry public databases.
On this one from aerospace.org, one can see starlink re-entries
yesterday, and also 29 sept., 27 sept., etc.
https://aerospace.org/reentries/grid
It seems to me - a non expert - that starlink regularly re-enters its
sats and puts new ones in orbit. Maybe a starlink sat has a lifetime of
2-3 years.
> Object
> <https://aerospace.org/reentries/grid?field_reentry_sighting_value=All&format_select=table&reentry_timezone_selector=UTC&order=title&sort=asc>
> Mission
> <https://aerospace.org/reentries/grid?field_reentry_sighting_value=All&format_select=table&reentry_timezone_selector=UTC&order=field_mission&sort=asc>
> Reentry Type
> <https://aerospace.org/reentries/grid?field_reentry_sighting_value=All&format_select=table&reentry_timezone_selector=UTC&order=field_reentry_type&sort=asc>
> Launched
> <https://aerospace.org/reentries/grid?field_reentry_sighting_value=All&format_select=table&reentry_timezone_selector=UTC&order=field_launched&sort=asc>
> Predicted Reentry Time
> <https://aerospace.org/reentries/grid?field_reentry_sighting_value=All&format_select=table&reentry_timezone_selector=UTC&order=field_predicted_reentry_time&sort=desc>
>
> STARLINK-1868 (ID 47154) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/47154>
> Launch L15 Payload Nov 25, 2020 Oct 01, 2023 15:39:12 ± 16 hours
> IUS R/B(1) (ID 19884) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/19884> STS
> 29/TDRS 4 Rocket Body Mar 13, 1989 Sep 30, 2023 12:32:28 ± 7 hours
> STARLINK-1074 (ID 44957) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/44957>
> Launch L2 Payload Jan 07, 2020 Sep 29, 2023 20:53:28 ± 3 hours
> STARLINK-5596 (ID 55476) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/55476>
> Launch Group 5-3 Payload Feb 02, 2023 Sep 27, 2023 17:41:11 ± 6 hours
> STARLINK-2345 (ID 47886) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/47886>
> Launch L21 Payload Mar 14, 2021 Sep 27, 2023 15:58:50 ± 1 hour
> COSMOS 1124 (ID 11509) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/11509> COSMOS
> 1124 Payload Aug 28, 1979 Sep 27, 2023 00:23:01 ± 1 hour
> CERES-1 R/B (ID 57796) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/57796> TIANQI
> 21-24 Rocket Body Sep 05, 2023 Sep 25, 2023 06:59:01 ± 1 hour
> STARLINK-2212 (ID 47779) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/47779>
> Launch L17 Payload Mar 04, 2021 Sep 25, 2023 03:11:43 ± 1 hour
> STARLINK-1419 (ID 45694) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/45694>
> Launch L7 Payload Jun 04, 2020 Sep 24, 2023 11:01:39 ± 10 hours
> STARLINK-1026 (ID 44731) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/44731>
> Launch L1 Payload Nov 11, 2019 Sep 22, 2023 22:21:15 ± 3 hours
> ELECTRON KICK STAGE R/B (ID 55328)
> <https://aerospace.org/reentries/46929> SPACEBEE Rocket Body Nov
> 20, 2020 Sep 21, 2023 12:57:34 ± 1 hour
> SL-4 R/B (ID 57863) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/57863> SOYUZ
> MS-24 Rocket Body Sep 15, 2023 Sep 18, 2023 04:58:16 ± 1 hour
> DELTA 2 R/B(2) (PAM-D) (ID 35754)
> <https://aerospace.org/reentries/35754> USA-206 (GPS IIRM-8) Rocket
> Body Aug 17, 2009 Sep 18, 2023 04:37:26 ± 1 hour
> KSLV-1 R/B (ID 39069) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/39069>
> STSAT-2C Rocket Body Jan 30, 2013 Sep 16, 2023 01:21:47 ± 1 hour
> ELECTRON R/B (ID 44635) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/44635>
> Palisade Rocket Body Oct 17, 2019 Sep 13, 2023 22:07:51 ± 1 hour
> STARLINK-30042 (ID 55702) <https://aerospace.org/reentries/55702>
> Starlink Group 6-1 Payload Feb 27, 2023 Sep 13, 2023 21:07:58 ± 3
> hours
>
Alex
Le 20/09/2023 à 00:55, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit :
> The original poster of that to twitter walks it back to 54 since the
> beginning of the year.
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:48 AM the keyboard of geoff goodfellow via
> Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> ➔➔https://cybernews.com/news/starlink-lost-200-satellites/
>
> --
> Geoff.Goodfellow@iconia.com
> living as The Truth is True
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>
>
> --
> Oct 30:
> https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
> Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-02 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 14:48 the keyboard of geoff goodfellow
2023-09-19 22:55 ` Dave Taht
2023-10-02 10:15 ` Alexandre Petrescu [this message]
2023-10-02 10:39 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-10-02 12:27 ` Michael Richardson
2023-10-02 13:48 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-10-02 20:08 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=94994411-fb55-402c-9606-d2d6c4b3e6d4@gmail.com \
--to=alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox