* Re: [Starlink] starlink videoconference today at 1PM PDT
[not found] ` <64576217-0531-45F5-B8C6-74702A62A7F6@gmail.com>
@ 2021-06-01 21:02 ` Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2021-06-01 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: starlink; +Cc: dickroy, Scott Staton
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3923 bytes --]
thx everyone for coming. I apologize for the chaos. It was the first day of funding for this project...
It was a great and exciting all up test of beta routing code over a beta ISP over an alpha videoconferencing codebase, over lousy wifi, from the side of a mountain, ov and so great to see you all.
The biggest failure was galene started throwing off errors mid-way through which need to be fixed.
On top of that "all up" test!!!! we were also testing the wifi VI queue, and AF42 dscp passthrough various isps. starlink seems to preserve at least some dscps end to end. Packet captures were taken at various endpoints that should be worth dissecting.
I do fear that large scale use of the VI queue may fail in some locations - including mine - as it is a significantly undertested wifi option. But sch_cake itself performed brilliantly...
Bulk Best Effort Video Voice
thresh 625Kbit 10Mbit 5Mbit 2500Kbit
target 29.1ms 5ms 5ms 7.27ms
interval 124ms 100ms 100ms 102ms
pk_delay 0us 2.3ms 4.65ms 1.72ms
av_delay 0us 243us 414us 128us
sp_delay 0us 12us 11us 9us
backlog 0b 0b 0b 0b
pkts 0 49469 656531 392
bytes 0 13661709 323367991 49808
way_inds 0 1011 13752 0
way_miss 0 3601 1523 12
way_cols 0 0 0 0
drops 0 40 6 0
marks 0 1 0 0
ack_drop 0 173 0 0
sp_flows 0 2 0 0
bk_flows 0 1 0 0
un_flows 0 0 0 0
max_len 0 1514 1392 590
quantum 300 305 300 300
> On Jun 1, 2021, at 12:28 PM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'll be there, if nothing else, to lurk! Thanks for the invite.
>
> Rich
>
>> On Jun 1, 2021, at 3:26 PM, Dave Taht <davet@teklibre.net <mailto:davet@teklibre.net>> wrote:
>>
>> I note for those attending today that donovan and I are behind a starlink terminal and despite our best efforts, it does tend to glitch occasionally. we would appreciate it if a few people here would drop in early so we can test some things.
>>
>>> On Jun 1, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Dave Taht <davet@teklibre.net <mailto:davet@teklibre.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sorry for the late notice, as this is a regularly scheduled bufferbloat “working latency” meeting. Today’s focus is on starlink.
>>>
>>> We have a very full agenda today, but all are invited here to attend to see the latest results from our work and to help us discuss next steps.
>>>
>>> We’ve been using the following galene.org <http://galene.org/> based videoconferencing server for our meetings
>>>
>>> https://tun.taht.net:8443/group/bufferbloat <https://tun.taht.net:8443/group/bufferbloat>
>>>
>>> Use any login you like, with no password, chrome is best
>>>
>>> TODAY’S AGENDA
>>>
>>> 5 minutes Dave Taht Overview of where we are
>>>
>>> 10 minutes introductions to various volunteers with dishy terminals
>>> 10 minutes discussing future plans this week
>>> 10 minutes ESR irtt updates
>>> 20 minutes open discussion
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12604 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread