From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=; dkim=pass header.d=falco.ca; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=falco.ca policy.dmarc=reject Received: from cmail.nextlayer.at (cmail.nextlayer.at [109.70.102.198]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B843DE9F193 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:15:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 6D24A3FCFE for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2026 03:15:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=falco.ca; s=dkim0; t=1774318500; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=/p6q8rvwB49Ev8uyCgkyxxpTJGC05ytvnWH+ppRBX38=; b=LRgkBreE4AI9C/J12SSzSyURznNYkqmk2XSySrgoVb8euFF5rOu2uCmw+F8yKrRdB4H+Ck Ml6WtNx2kwEVv+Bf0VAzDEBhd/ISTwVTzMiotwXxB1IqXRT9/WQspwaJ3AedNG8UHRE7kM p1zYup9BBX5+uNHs14JePfDkX6CWw0jKGhZ0mdurQn0Cd48ue1alYYPGtwCxFWMCMlfxlS GjVfc8uVe4kuju/ZyQjynvqdmxeWXvGZkl76D2B7A3ssk2Xo+tB+rWHKTf4L2D7fwHQPxt tH6upR4yRWx+wjFxWa3id2eyMpw9hyS0BeeJJwyoK9vsZT8C+4FHfuAmUn11LQ== Message-ID: <9bcfa2e7-a13a-4d36-9325-f793db1c3130@falco.ca> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 19:20:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <4fce5ae5-382b-437f-867f-512a2f478a39@auckland.ac.nz> Content-Language: en-CA, de-AT From: Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Message-ID-Hash: L7CT6KM5TYTXFQTMCW7WMVSPQIAQS2UX X-Message-ID-Hash: L7CT6KM5TYTXFQTMCW7WMVSPQIAQS2UX X-MailFrom: daniel@falco.ca X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Subject: [Starlink] Re: FCC declares all new router models illegal List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 2026-03-23 at 19:10, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink wrote: > On 24/03/2026 3:09 pm, Daniel AJ Sokolov via Starlink wrote: >> On 2026-03-23 at 19:01, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink wrote: >>> Well it's not entirely off-topic: >>> >>> https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c74787w149zo >>> >>> Quote: >>> >>>> One exception to the general absence of US-made routers is the newer >>>> Starlink WiFi router. Starlink is part of Elon Musk's company SpaceX. >>>> >>>> The company says the Starlink routers are made in Texas >> >> I doubt that. No Open Source? All major components made in the US? >> >> They might be assembled there. But that is not enough under the new >> rules. > > Good point. But who will be able to assess all this at a price point > that keeps it a consumer device? Or will it be left to lawyers who know > exactly what "made in the US" means? It is up the FCC who has to issue certification. They will demand a lot of documentation about the supply chain. BR Daniel