From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 203323B2A4 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:38:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E271260C8; Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 16:38:25 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: Dave Taht cc: Daniel AJ Sokolov , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <9no55687-41n9-39s3-2s-r6n953309167@ynat.uz> References: <08c6ab5c-6a9d-e555-671c-5c59cffcd02d@falco.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-ID: <88578qpn-0p6-oq2-q5n4-no28q43p8sro@ynat.uz> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Optimized for Speedtest? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 23:38:27 -0000 >> Is that something done in the satellites who shift capacity from other users >> to those users who initiate downloads? Is that done on the backhaul? > > Wish we knew. In my ideal world they would supply a statistic that a > sch_cake could take and vary the rate/buffering based on that on the > home router, or just do it more right > in the dishy and head ends with cake + BQL. I have noticed very different speeds at different times (I can't know for sure who is up an using it, but middle of the night speeds tend to be much better than late evening speeds so I'm guessing it correlates to usage) David Lang