From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (rrcs-45-59-245-186.west.biz.rr.com [45.59.245.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D947E3B29D for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 02:04:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E471B8B51; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 23:04:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2023 23:04:20 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang To: Jim Forster cc: Inemesit Affia , Starlink In-Reply-To: <061BCB88-D7AB-4707-AC29-66968AD13480@connectivitycap.com> Message-ID: <9pr6s221-51s2-2r07-0869-o133rpq34ns1@ynat.uz> References: <34D160E7-6C8F-4882-B1C3-570DF3D3854F@connectivitycap.com> <061BCB88-D7AB-4707-AC29-66968AD13480@connectivitycap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="===============0593820899614162341==" Subject: Re: [Starlink] Question on Startlink density X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 07:04:21 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --===============0593820899614162341== Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 15 Nov 2023, Jim Forster via Starlink wrote: > Oh, sorry, I was not clear. The question is could they support 100 terminals along a mile. Each a separate consumer residential account. ahh, that is going to depend how many other people are in your area. But if it's only 100 terminals and nobody else for miles, I don't think there would be any problems. David Lang >> On Nov 15, 2023, at 8:55 AM, Inemesit Affia wrote: >> >> What you're planning might we'll be against the Starlink TOS. >> >> Just contact https://old.reddit.com/user/millijuna. He's done something similar >> >> Beyond that networks are networks. You estimate your peak traffic, find out the worst case speed on starlink and get software/hardware to shape & prioritize traffic/users so phone calls work when the WAN can't do video. Check out libreqos >> >> Also the owner of starlink.sx is on this mailing list and has experience with this sort of thing > > Yeah, I’ve asked Mike :-) > > — Jim > >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023, 7:13 AM Jim Forster via Starlink > wrote: >>> >>> Does Starlink’s beam forming support delivering services to about 100 home stretched over one mile? The place in question would like to do fiber, but it’s in a senstive area, so getting permits is tricky (cannot use any previously undisturbed land), and so the fiber project has dragged on. Now SL is available and some are getting it. That’s fine, but could it support 100 over one linear mile? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> — Jim >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlink mailing list >>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > --===============0593820899614162341== Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: INLINE X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KU3Rhcmxpbmsg bWFpbGluZyBsaXN0ClN0YXJsaW5rQGxpc3RzLmJ1ZmZlcmJsb2F0Lm5ldApodHRwczovL2xpc3Rz LmJ1ZmZlcmJsb2F0Lm5ldC9saXN0aW5mby9zdGFybGluawo= --===============0593820899614162341==--