From: "Dick Roy" <dickroy@alum.mit.edu>
To: "'Nathan Owens'" <nathan@nathan.io>
Cc: <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] For all you PHY enthusiasists
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 11:04:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A95649EA7ED84D998E1953677CCF44FE@SRA6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALjsLJsgy6DqNVfpsK41xkVVwi3EHptvBpP_TvkrHJDPDw0Agg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1563 bytes --]
_____
From: Nathan Owens [mailto:nathan@nathan.io]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2021 10:29 AM
To: dickroy@alum.mit.edu
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] For all you PHY enthusiasists
What's state of the art that isn't space rated?
[RR] Obviously lots of things like the WiFi chips in every device on the
planet (not in space):^)))))
I assume wayyy more capable than this thing? The Xilinx Ultrascale+ RFSOC
has 16x 2.5GSP ADCs or 8x at 5GSP with 14 bits, and that's sorta old tech at
16nm.
[RR] Just a matter of price/performance tradeoffs at this point . agreed!
That said, space hardening comes at a cost .
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 9:01 AM Dick Roy <dickroy@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
FYI all PHY enthusiasts .
https://www.electronicdesign.com/markets/defense/article/21168402/microwaves
-rf-fourchannel-adc-makes-the-grade-for-space?utm_source=EG%20ED%20Today
<https://www.electronicdesign.com/markets/defense/article/21168402/microwave
s-rf-fourchannel-adc-makes-the-grade-for-space?utm_source=EG%20ED%20Today&ut
m_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS210625102&o_eid=5487F0022834D6Y&rdx.ident%5Bp
ull%5D=omeda%7C5487F0022834D6Y&oly_enc_id=5487F0022834D6Y>
&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=CPS210625102&o_eid=5487F0022834D6Y&rdx.ident%
5Bpull%5D=omeda%7C5487F0022834D6Y&oly_enc_id=5487F0022834D6Y
This is especially relevant for smart antenna geeks!
Cheers,
RR
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 8286 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 16:01 Dick Roy
2021-06-30 17:29 ` Nathan Owens
2021-06-30 18:04 ` Dick Roy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A95649EA7ED84D998E1953677CCF44FE@SRA6 \
--to=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=nathan@nathan.io \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox