From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2d4:f00f:f00f:b33b:b33b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB8883CB35 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 13:52:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (c-73-241-93-6.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.241.93.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 818B422A10; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.43\)) From: Dave Taht In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 10:52:16 -0700 Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Jared Mauch X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.43) Subject: Re: [Starlink] dslreports speedtest X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 17:52:19 -0000 Dear Jared: if this is a wired result (it doesn=E2=80=99t look like it to me but it = won=E2=80=99t be the first time I had confirmation bias!!), well, sigh. 1) Regardless, could you take a packet capture while re-running that = dslreports test and put it somewhere we can get at? The tcp rtt stats are good to look at in wireshark. I typically just capture via tcpdump -i myinterface -s 128 -w whatever.cap -n 2) Please don=E2=80=99t use the raspi=E2=80=99s 4=E2=80=99s wifi? It has = horrifically bad bufferbloat in the first place, and there have been = other reported bugs involving it=E2=80=99s multicast implementation = taking down whole networks. 3) what the wifi chip and OS was driving this test? The uplink = bufferbloat has some major spikes but if you look at the detailed report = that might be misleading. > On Jun 28, 2021, at 3:38 PM, Jared Mauch = wrote: >=20 > my result if someone wants to look at it: >=20 > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/68794590 >=20 > I'm about 40-50' away from the router which is outside with the > solar panels and other gear. I'm inside and dishy is on the roof > partially obstructed but somewhat better after some light application = of > the chainsaw. >=20 > - jared >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 06:35:25PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: >>=20 >> I went to go check my bufferbloat and it says: >>=20 >> This connection is not satellite >> latency of 45ms is too low >> Test cancelled >>=20 >> Kinda amusing. >>=20 >> - Jared >>=20 >> (e-mail sent over ssh via starlink) >>=20 >> --=20 >> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from = jared@puck.nether.net >> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only = mine. >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >=20 > --=20 > Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net > clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only = mine. > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink